Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1432
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1432
27 Apr 2026
 | 27 Apr 2026

Improving the Confidence in Retrievals of Vertical Distributions of Cloud Condensation Nuclei Number Concentration from ARM Supported by Aircraft In Situ Observations

Jingjing Tian, Gourihar Kulkarni, Jennifer M. Comstock, John E. Shilling, Damao Zhang, Peng Wu, and Fan Mei

Abstract. Accurate quantification of the vertical distribution of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentrations is critical for improving our understanding of aerosol–cloud interactions. Ground-based Raman lidars operated by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program, together with surface CCN measurements, are used to retrieve vertically resolved CCN number concentrations (Retrieved Number concentration of CCN, RNCCN). These retrievals rely on several assumptions, including that aerosol composition is vertically homogeneous. To assess this assumption, we developed and tested a framework to infer the dominant aerosol classes/types at different altitudes. This was done by applying a k-Nearest-Neighbors (kNN) algorithm to lidar ratio and linear depolarization ratio measurements from Raman lidar. We evaluated the framework using aircraft aerosol and CCN measurements from the ARM Holistic Interactions of Shallow Clouds, Aerosols, and Land Ecosystems (HI-SCALE) field campaign. The results show that RNCCN performance degrades as vertical aerosol complexity increases, i.e., RNCCN agrees with the aircraft CCN in vertically homogeneous conditions, but closure decreases in layered aerosol structures. To generalize beyond individual examples, we introduce a metric (heterogeneity index) that quantifies the vertical complexity by assessing the variation of inferred aerosol classes/types. Case-level statistics show a tendency for RNCCN and aircraft differences to increase with this metric. By detecting retrievals that are likely compromised by aerosol vertical heterogeneity, the proposed framework improves the interpretability and effective use of RNCCN used for long-term evaluation of models and aerosol–cloud interactions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

06 Aug 2026
Improving the confidence in retrievals of vertical distributions of cloud condensation nuclei number concentration from ARM supported by aircraft in situ observations
Jingjing Tian, Gourihar Kulkarni, Jennifer M. Comstock, John E. Shilling, Damao Zhang, Peng Wu, and Fan Mei
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 5051–5069, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5051-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5051-2026, 2026
Short summary
Jingjing Tian, Gourihar Kulkarni, Jennifer M. Comstock, John E. Shilling, Damao Zhang, Peng Wu, and Fan Mei

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1432', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 May 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jingjing Tian, 30 Jun 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1432', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 May 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jingjing Tian, 30 Jun 2026

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1432', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 May 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jingjing Tian, 30 Jun 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1432', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 May 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jingjing Tian, 30 Jun 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Jingjing Tian on behalf of the Authors (30 Jun 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (13 Jul 2026) by Anthony Bucholtz
AR by Jingjing Tian on behalf of the Authors (14 Jul 2026)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

06 Aug 2026
Improving the confidence in retrievals of vertical distributions of cloud condensation nuclei number concentration from ARM supported by aircraft in situ observations
Jingjing Tian, Gourihar Kulkarni, Jennifer M. Comstock, John E. Shilling, Damao Zhang, Peng Wu, and Fan Mei
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 5051–5069, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5051-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-5051-2026, 2026
Short summary
Jingjing Tian, Gourihar Kulkarni, Jennifer M. Comstock, John E. Shilling, Damao Zhang, Peng Wu, and Fan Mei

Data sets

RNCCNPROF1KULKARNI value-added product (VAP) G. Kulkarni https://doi.org/10.5439/1813858

DeliAn data A. A. Floutsi et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7751752

Jingjing Tian, Gourihar Kulkarni, Jennifer M. Comstock, John E. Shilling, Damao Zhang, Peng Wu, and Fan Mei

Viewed

Total article views: 400 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
294 70 36 400 38 37
  • HTML: 294
  • PDF: 70
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 400
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 37
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Apr 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Apr 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 384 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 384 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Aug 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Cloud condensation nuclei are tiny particles that attract water vapor and help form clouds. A ground-based lidar method can estimate their number at different heights, but assumes the aerosol type does not change with height. Comparisons with aircraft data show good agreement of this method when aerosols are well mixed, but larger errors when stacked layers occur. We also developed an index to flag these complex conditions and indicate when this estimation method is more reliable.
Share