Subseasonal and spatial variability of biomass burning aerosol radiative properties observed over the Southeast Atlantic during ORACLES 2016&ndash;2018

Mitchell, Logan T.; Flynn, Connor J.; Pistone, Kristina; LeBlanc, Samuel E.; Schmidt, K. Sebastian; Chen, Hong; Zuidema, Paquita; Wood, Robert; Redemann, Jens

doi:10.5194/egusphere-2026-1418

Preprints

https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1418

Preprints

27 Mar 2026

| 27 Mar 2026

Subseasonal and spatial variability of biomass burning aerosol radiative properties observed over the Southeast Atlantic during ORACLES 2016–2018

Logan T. Mitchell, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Samuel E. LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, and Jens Redemann

Abstract. During 2016–2018, NASA conducted the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) airborne field campaigns to study aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions with the stratocumulus cloud deck over the Southeast Atlantic. ORACLES employed 4STAR (Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research) to measure direct solar irradiances and diffuse sky radiances of free-tropospheric Biomass Burning Aerosols (BBA). Aerosol radiative properties, including Single Scattering Albedo (SSA), Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth (AAOD), Extinction Ångström Exponent (EAE), Absorption Ångström Exponent (AAE), and complex refractive indices are retrieved via an adapted AERONET inversion code. Changes in SSA indicate increased scattering as the biomass burning season progresses, which we attribute to an aerosol brightening from compositional changes, rather than a change in aerosol type, with an apparent lack of Brown Carbon throughout the season. A collection of 31 AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork) sun/sky photometer stations have operated in Southern Africa for over thirty years (1995–2025), creating a complete aerosol climatology for the first time, which can be compared with SSA and AOD from ORACLES observations. The spatial distributions of in situ SSA are also investigated by latitude, longitude, and altitude. Westward gradual increases and sharper decreases in SSA are attributed to late-transport aging processes identified by previous studies. These processes start further eastward in October, in conjunction with the southeastward shift in source fires. Collectively, ORACLES 4STAR retrievals and in situ measurements have identified subseasonal and spatial trends in SSA over the Southeast Atlantic that complement the Southern African AERONET climatology.

Received: 13 Mar 2026 – Discussion started: 27 Mar 2026

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Download & links

Logan T. Mitchell, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Samuel E. LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, and Jens Redemann

Status: final response (author comments only)

RC1:
'Comment on egusphere-2026-1418', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Apr 2026
This study investigates the subseasonal and spatial variability of biomass burning aerosol (BBA) radiative properties over the Southeast Atlantic (SEA). By utilizing airborne 4STAR measurements from the NASA ORACLES campaigns (2016-2018) alongside long-term AERONET climatological data, the manuscript provides valuable insights into the evolution of Single Scattering Albedo (SSA), Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), and Absorption Aerosol Optical Depth (AAOD). The findings regarding the "aerosol brightening" effect as the burning season progresses are particularly interesting.
Overall, the paper is well-structured, and the dataset is highly valuable for improving aerosol-radiation interactions in climate models. However, there are several areas where the analysis requires deeper attribution, particularly regarding interannual variability, aerosol composition, and the justification of certain methodological constraints. I recommend the manuscript for publication after addressing the following major revisions.
Major Comments
The data representing the three different months in this study (August, September, and October) were collected across three completely different years (2017, 2016, and 2018, respectively). Consequently, the deduced subseasonal trends (e.g., from August to October) might be heavily influenced or obscured by the interannual characteristics of aerosol emissions and meteorological conditions. The authors need to explicitly state this limitation in the text and discuss how interannual emission variations might impact their subseasonal conclusions.

The current discussion regarding the characteristics of SSA, AOD, and AAOD in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 is somewhat descriptive and one-sided. Could the authors provide a more in-depth attribution linking these optical properties to the proportional changes and concentrations of aerosol compositions during the biomass burning period? It is highly recommended to acquire observational data or reanalysis datasets (such as MERRA-2) on aerosol composition and concentration, and add these to the supplementary materials. This would intuitively demonstrate how variations in aerosol composition and concentration drive the observed changes in SSA, AOD, etc.

To further support the explanations for the variations in parameters like SSA and AOD, the authors should consider adding statistical charts or maps that represent the intensity of biomass burning (e.g., Fire Radiative Power (FRP) or fire counts) to the supplementary materials. Illustrating the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of the emission sources would greatly assist in interpreting the downstream aerosol properties.

The manuscript demonstrates that the lower SSA observed by 4STAR in 2016 (September) is largely due to the campaign base being in Namibia, meaning the sampling region was further south and did not fully capture the central smoke plume near the equator. This implies that the subseasonal trend shown in Figures 2 and 3 (the drop in September and massive rise in October) is largely driven by a spatial sampling bias rather than pure temporal evolution. This spatial caveat should be stated more explicitly in the Abstract and Conclusions to avoid misleading readers who might interpret this purely as a temporal shift.

The study restricts the 4STAR sky scans to altitudes of < 3 km. Is the selection of this specific boundary reasonable and fully justified? Is it possible that a significant portion of the biomass burning aerosols is transported to altitudes above 3 km in this region? A brief justification or a reference regarding the vertical distribution of the aerosol plume during the campaign should be added to clarify why 3 km is an appropriate cutoff.

In Lines 427-430, the authors mention the potential to extrapolate 4STAR data to the UV band. Given this possibility, why wasn't this step performed in the current study? Relying solely on visible and near-infrared Absorption Angstrom Exponent (AAE) to completely exclude the role of Brown Carbon (BrC) might not be rigorous enough. Combining optical parameters in the UV band with the AAE numerical characteristics would provide a much more convincing argument when explaining the statistical features and relative contributions of Black Carbon (BC) versus BrC. If there are technical limitations preventing this extrapolation currently, please explain them explicitly and slightly soften the conclusions regarding the absence of BrC.

Minor Comments
Lines 165-166：The authors mention using a 10-second rolling average for in situ data and dividing the total observations by 10 to estimate the number of independent samples. While statistically reasonable, please briefly state the typical cruising speed of the aircraft and translate this 10-second window into an approximate spatial resolution (in kilometers). This will help readers understand the spatial scale of an "independent sample."
Lines 196-202：When utilizing the two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, strong autocorrelation in continuous flight data can artificially lower p-values (overestimating significance). Please explicitly confirm in the text that the sample size ( ) input into these statistical tests is the reduced independent sample size (divided by 10), rather than the raw number of data points.
Lines 245-248：The authors cite several papers that similarly found a lack of BrC. Since the presence and transport of BrC in this region can be a debated topic, it would provide a more balanced literature review to briefly mention 1-2 studies that have identified BrC contributions in the SEA or its source regions (if applicable), before explaining why this study's findings differ.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1418-RC1
RC2:
'Comment on egusphere-2026-1418', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 May 2026
The manuscript documents the subseasonal and spatial variability of biomass burning (BB) aerosols properties over the Southeast Atlantic (SEA) region during the NASA ORACLES campaigns (2016-2018). It combines airborne 4STAR and long-term AERONET measurements of single scattering albedo (SSA), aerosol optical depth (AOD), and absorption aerosol optical depth (AAOD). The results investigate the distinction between BC and BrC during the biomass burning season.
My recommendation is that the manuscript can be published after major revisions. The dataset and the manuscript concept are strong, but several central methodological choices are not yet documented or stress-tested enough to support some of the stronger interpretations.
Major comments
While the manuscript effectively identifies subseasonal and spatial trends, it lacks atmospheric trajectory modeling (e.g., HYSPLIT or FLEXPART) to confirm the specific origins of the aerosols. I suggest including an analysis of back-trajectories for the study periods, this would provide vital context for the transport pathways, provide a more robust validation of the proposed source fire shifts, and strengthen the manuscript.

The study covers three months (August–October) over a three-year period. I recommend adding a discussion on how interannual differences in meteorological conditions might have affected the finding.

Lines 255–258: The authors attribute regional differences in SSA to a shift in source fires toward Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique, referencing trajectory analyses from Dobracki et al. (2023). However, Dobracki et al. primarily analyzed data from 2016. Given that this manuscript includes ORACLES data from 2017 and 2018, it is unclear whether this source shift is consistent across the entire study period. I recommend that the authors either demonstrate that their own data (2017–2018) exhibits similar transport patterns or explicitly discuss the interannual consistency of this source fire shift.

To better support the claims regarding the aerosol brightening process and the distinction between BrC and BC, I suggest adding a scatter plot showing the relationship between AAE and SSA (or another identification space). This would allow the reader to see if the aerosol population shifts from a cluster associated with BrC absorption toward a less absorbing regime over time.

Lines 427–429: The authors note that expanding the 4STAR dataset into the UV spectrum using the hyperspectral GRASP code could better isolate BrC absorption. Given that the manuscript’s primary focus is the aerosol brightening process and the distinction between BrC and BC, this would be a great addition. I recommend that the authors either incorporate these results or provide a more detailed justification for why this methodology was not applied in the conclusions.

Minor comments
Line 19: First use of acronym “AERONET” is here so add "AErosol RObotic NETwork".

Lines 112-113: SSA, AOD, AAAOD, EAE, AAE are already stated in the introduction so you can use freely the acronym.

Line 146: First use of acronym “PSAP”, so you need to define the acronym.

Line 146: You mention that both PSAP & Neph measure in the same wavelengths, consider correcting the table caption (Since in the table you mention a difference of 20 and 40 nm between two instruments).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1418-RC2

Logan T. Mitchell, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Samuel E. LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, and Jens Redemann

Data sets

ORACLES Aerosol Aircraft In Situ Data NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC https://doi.org/10.5067/ASDC_DAAC/ORACLES_Aerosol_AircraftInSitu_Data_1

AERONET NASA GSFC https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/

Logan T. Mitchell, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Samuel E. LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, and Jens Redemann

Viewed

Total article views: 684 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	BibTeX	EndNote
493	157	34	684	32	43

HTML: 493
PDF: 157
XML: 34
Total: 684
BibTeX: 32
EndNote: 43

Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Mar 2026)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Mar 2026	345	99	21	465
Apr 2026	132	54	13	199
May 2026	16	4	0	20

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Mar 2026)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Mar 2026	345	99	21	465
Apr 2026	132	54	13	199
May 2026	16	4	0	20

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 684 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 684 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country	#	Views	%

Latest update: 09 May 2026

Short summary

During 2016–2018, NASA conducted an airborne field campaign over the Southeast Atlantic Ocean to study biomass burning aerosols emitted from Southern African fires. We have found that aerosol scattering increases over the course of the emission season, which is due to a compositional change within black carbon as the source fires shift southeastward, rather than an increase in brown carbon. This aerosol brightening is also noted within a 30-year aerosol climatology from ground-based stations.


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0