Multi-dimensional, Multi-Constraint Seismic Inversion of Acoustic Impedance Using Fuzzy Clustering Concepts
Abstract. Seismic inversion is a fundamental procedure that converts seismic data into useful information about underlying rock and fluid characteristics. However, because seismic data are band-limited, the inversion process is intrinsically difficult, resulting in non-unique solutions. To overcome these issues, several constraints are used to enforce properties such as smoothness and sparsity on the inversion results. We propose a technique that includes the clustering properties of previous information, such as well logs and geological data, into the inversion process. This grouping helps to preserve geological continuity and improves the resolution of the inversion data. By incorporating this strategy into our inversion framework, we can better describe the subsurface and deliver more consistent findings. Our technique was evaluated on both synthetic and actual seismic data, confirming its ability to generate accurate acoustic impedance models. Furthermore, the approach generated deconvolved and denoised versions of the seismic data, which are useful for future interpretation. The membership sections generated by the inversion method also demonstrated considerable promise for tracing geological horizons, discriminating between distinct sequences and layers, and even predicting likely layer contents. In conclusion, this work proposes an upgraded seismic inversion approach that utilizes the ability of clustering to incorporate earlier geological knowledge, resulting in more accurate and interpretable findings.
I would like to congratulate the authors on writing a very interesting paper. Their overview of inversion methods is comprehensive and well written. The Fuzzy clustering approach introduced in this paper has merit as demonstrated in their applications to synthetic and real seismic data. I especially like the displays of membership sections, which I have not seen before in seismic inversion publications. This novelty seems to have potential for qualitative and quantitative interpretation of geologic features and rock property predictions. I have only one comment: In the table on line 270, the authors give three possible inputs: seismic data, well data and other petrophysical data. Sonic and Density fall under well data. Since Acoustic Impedance is Density divided by Sonic, this is all you need. The authors should explain which "Other petrophysical data" adds value to the inversion process. Alternatively, I suggest removing the "Other petrophysical data" from the table and from the text.
I noted a few typos (spaces, mistakenly saying fuzzy instead of clustering) and inconsistencies in the reference list. I've uploaded a pdf with my comments.
I enjoyed reading this work and recommend it for publication with minor edits.
Best regards,
Dr. Paul de Groot, dGB Earth SciencesÂ