the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Multi-dimensional, Multi-Constraint Seismic Inversion of Acoustic Impedance Using Fuzzy Clustering Concepts
Abstract. Seismic inversion is a fundamental procedure that converts seismic data into useful information about underlying rock and fluid characteristics. However, because seismic data are band-limited, the inversion process is intrinsically difficult, resulting in non-unique solutions. To overcome these issues, several constraints are used to enforce properties such as smoothness and sparsity on the inversion results. We propose a technique that includes the clustering properties of previous information, such as well logs and geological data, into the inversion process. This grouping helps to preserve geological continuity and improves the resolution of the inversion data. By incorporating this strategy into our inversion framework, we can better describe the subsurface and deliver more consistent findings. Our technique was evaluated on both synthetic and actual seismic data, confirming its ability to generate accurate acoustic impedance models. Furthermore, the approach generated deconvolved and denoised versions of the seismic data, which are useful for future interpretation. The membership sections generated by the inversion method also demonstrated considerable promise for tracing geological horizons, discriminating between distinct sequences and layers, and even predicting likely layer contents. In conclusion, this work proposes an upgraded seismic inversion approach that utilizes the ability of clustering to incorporate earlier geological knowledge, resulting in more accurate and interpretable findings.
- Preprint
(2065 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Jul 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1391', Paul de Groot, 27 May 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Saber Jahanjooy, 03 Jun 2026
reply
Dear Paul
Thank you very much for your positive and encouraging comments on our manuscript.
W e are grateful for your remarks regarding the membership sections. As you noted, we believe they have significant potential for geological interpretation and rock-property analysis.
We also appreciate your constructive comment regarding the inclusion of "other petrophysical data" in Algorithm 1. We agree that density and sonic logs are sufficient to derive acoustic impedance, which is the primary property inverted in this study. Our intention was to highlight the flexibility of the proposed framework, where additional information such as porosity, lithology, saturation, core measurements, or interpreted facies can be incorporated into the clustering process when available. These data are not required for the inversion itself, but they may provide additional constraints for defining cluster centers and memberships.
To avoid confusion, we have revised the manuscript and clarified that these additional petrophysical data are optional and are only used as supplementary information for the clustering component of the workflow.
We also thank you for carefully identifying the typographical errors and inconsistencies in the references. All of the corrections noted in the annotated PDF have been addressed in the revised manuscript. The revisions will be applied as soon as we receive the revisions of the other reviewers.
We sincerely appreciate your careful review, valuable suggestions, and recommendation for publication.
Best regards,
The Authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1391-AC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Paul de Groot, 03 Jun 2026
reply
Thank you Jahanjooy for addressing my comments. I agree with your reply concerning the flexibility of the proposed method and that adding additional variables could impact the clustering and therefore might influence the inversion result. I trust you also see the danger of this approach, especially since acoustic impedance is only related to sonic and density.Â
Best regards,
Paul.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1391-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Paul de Groot, 03 Jun 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Saber Jahanjooy, 03 Jun 2026
reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1391', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jun 2026
reply
Dear Editor,
Thank you for inviting me to review this manuscript. The paper presents a multi-objective post-stack acoustic impedance inversion method that combines data misfit, model perturbation, sparsity, smoothness, and fuzzy clustering constraints. The topic is relevant to seismic inversion and reservoir characterization, and the attempt to use clustering-derived membership sections as interpretation products is potentially useful.
In my opinion, the manuscript contains an interesting idea and may be suitable for publication after substantial revision. However, the current version still has several important weaknesses. The novelty relative to existing fuzzy-clustering and sparse seismic inversion studies should be clarified, the mathematical formulation should be checked carefully, and the numerical validation should be strengthened using a more geologically complex benchmark model. The present synthetic model is relatively simple, which limits the strength of the conclusions regarding robustness, resolution improvement, and reduced dependence on the initial model or wavelet.
Therefore, I recommend Major Revision. The authors should revise the theoretical formulation, clarify the contribution of the method, provide more transparent parameter-selection criteria, test the method on a more complex benchmark such as the Marmousi or Marmousi2 model.
Sincerely,
Sen
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Saber Jahanjooy, 12 Jun 2026
reply
Dear Reviewer,
We express our sincere appreciation for the thorough and constructive review provided by Reviewer 1, which has had a highly valuable impact on enhancing the quality of our manuscript. In response, we have prepared a detailed, point-by-point response file addressing all comments, which is attached here. At this time, we are waiting for the second reviewer's comments to be submitted. Because the portal restricts the upload of a revised manuscript until all reviewer evaluations are complete, the system is currently inactive for file updates. We look forward to uploading the updated version of our manuscript as soon as the second review is finalized and the system becomes fully active for formal resubmission.
Meanwhile, I have emailed the tracked version of the edited manuscript to the editorial support team.Sincerely,
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC1', Saber Jahanjooy, 12 Jun 2026
reply
The attached is application of the proposed seismic inversion on the Marmousi section.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Saber Jahanjooy, 12 Jun 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163 | 39 | 8 | 210 | 30 | 32 |
- HTML: 163
- PDF: 39
- XML: 8
- Total: 210
- BibTeX: 30
- EndNote: 32
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
I would like to congratulate the authors on writing a very interesting paper. Their overview of inversion methods is comprehensive and well written. The Fuzzy clustering approach introduced in this paper has merit as demonstrated in their applications to synthetic and real seismic data. I especially like the displays of membership sections, which I have not seen before in seismic inversion publications. This novelty seems to have potential for qualitative and quantitative interpretation of geologic features and rock property predictions. I have only one comment: In the table on line 270, the authors give three possible inputs: seismic data, well data and other petrophysical data. Sonic and Density fall under well data. Since Acoustic Impedance is Density divided by Sonic, this is all you need. The authors should explain which "Other petrophysical data" adds value to the inversion process. Alternatively, I suggest removing the "Other petrophysical data" from the table and from the text.
I noted a few typos (spaces, mistakenly saying fuzzy instead of clustering) and inconsistencies in the reference list. I've uploaded a pdf with my comments.
I enjoyed reading this work and recommend it for publication with minor edits.
Best regards,
Dr. Paul de Groot, dGB Earth SciencesÂ