Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-139
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-139
21 Jan 2026
 | 21 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Dissolved organic carbon-mediated controls dominate soil carbon mineralization in response to freeze-thaw cycles

Jiaxin Yan, Jinyang Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Mingming Wang, Ting Sun, Jiajun Mao, and Zhongkui Luo

Abstract. Soil freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs) exert substantial effects on the mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC), particularly in high-altitude and -latitude cold regions. Ongoing climate change is altering FTC frequency and duration, yet the responses of SOC mineralization to such changes remain poorly understood, limiting our ability to predict carbon cycle-climate feedbacks. Here, we incubated soils from two depths across three sites to quantify how FTC regimes regulate SOC mineralization and explore underlying controls. Across all treatments, we observed a pronounced thaw-induced pulse of CO2 release, but more frequent freeze-thaw cycles led to more cumulative CO2 release, given the same length of cumulative thaw days. Across treatments, mineralization was most strongly correlated with DOC and hydrolytic/oxidative enzyme activities, while being suppressed by mineralogical (free and amorphous Fe/Al oxides) and physical (aggregate-protected carbon) constraints. Partial correlations and path analyses revealed that DOC was the single most consistent predictor of mineralization, retaining its influence even when enzymatic, substrate quality, or mineralogical variables were controlled. Subsoil SOC mineralization was additionally shaped by molecular carbon composition and mineral protection. These findings reveal a vertical shift from DOC-mediated substrate accessibility to molecularly and physically constrained decomposition. Accounting for these depth-specific mechanisms will improve prediction of SOC-climate feedbacks under FTC shifts due to climate change.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jiaxin Yan, Jinyang Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Mingming Wang, Ting Sun, Jiajun Mao, and Zhongkui Luo

Status: open (until 04 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jiaxin Yan, Jinyang Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Mingming Wang, Ting Sun, Jiajun Mao, and Zhongkui Luo
Jiaxin Yan, Jinyang Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Mingming Wang, Ting Sun, Jiajun Mao, and Zhongkui Luo

Viewed

Total article views: 28 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
16 10 2 28 5 0 0
  • HTML: 16
  • PDF: 10
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 28
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 57 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 57 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Freezing and thawing can speed soil carbon loss in cold regions, and climate change is altering how often these events occur. We incubated soils from different depths under freeze–thaw patterns and measured carbon dioxide release and dissolved carbon. Thaw bursts weakened with repeated cycles, yet higher frequency produced more total carbon loss. Dissolved carbon best predicted losses at all depths, while deeper soils relied more on enzymes and surface soils on organic matter protection.
Share