the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Machine learning significantly improves the simulation of hourly-to-yearly scale cloud nuclei concentration and radiative forcing in polluted atmosphere
Abstract. The accurate prediction of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentration (NCCN) on a large spatiotemporal scale is challenging but critical to evaluate the aerosol cloud interaction effect. Combining multi-source dataset and the NCCN simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model, we have developed a Random Forest Regression method (RFRM) model which achieves well prediction of hourly-to-yearly scale NCCN at typical supersaturations in polluted North China Plain (NCP). We show that the prediction bias of NCCN compared to observations is reduced from -59 % with the WRF-Chem model to approximately -31 % with the RFRM model (the prediction precision is improved by 1.6 times accordingly) during the campaigns. The greatest improvement is seen in both very polluted and clean cases. The RFRM model captures well the spatial variation and better describes long-term trends of NCCN. More importantly, the prediction reveals a significant long-term decreasing trend of NCCN in NCP due to a rapid reduction in aerosol concentrations from 2014 to 2018, during which a series of strict emission reduction measures were implemented by the Chinese government. This reflects the climate benefit of pollution control. Our study further illustrates that the RFRM model reduces the uncertainty in simulating cloud radiative forcing from an overestimation of 1.89 ± 0.78 W m-2 to 0.81 ± 0.63 W m-2, illustrating the high sensitivity of climate forcing to changes in NCCN. This work offers a new modeling framework that guides the way to simulate CCN in other regions around the world and has the potential to effectively filling the observation gap of CCN concentrations.
- Preprint
(2107 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1516 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1347', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1347/egusphere-2026-1347-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-1347-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1347', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jun 2026
The authors present a framework combining multi-source data with Random Forest Regression to predict CCN concentrations. The significant improvement in prediction accuracy over the traditional WRF-Chem model, particularly in capturing long-term trends in the North China Plain. This study bridges the observation gap and highlights the climate benefits of emission controls. The methodology is sound, and the results are compelling. I recommend publication after minor revisions.
- Organic matter was found to be the most crucial indicator for the CCN concentration prediction. The results are interesting; the inorganic salts are always thought to have high potential for the CCN. More explanation is needed here, if the number concentrations would increase under the high OM conditions?
- The influence of temperature showed the bidirectional influence, whether the temperature would influence the emission sources or the chemical reaction in the atmosphere.
- The ratio between POA and SOA is important for the number of CCN. Can the model separate these two components? How about the performance of the simulation?
- A few sites near the coast with positive values in recent years, why accumulation-mode particles increase, more discussion would be helpful.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1347-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 218 | 47 | 24 | 289 | 34 | 20 | 20 |
- HTML: 218
- PDF: 47
- XML: 24
- Total: 289
- Supplement: 34
- BibTeX: 20
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1