Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1335
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1335
18 Mar 2026
 | 18 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Integrating Ozone–vegetation Damage Schemes into SSiB4/TRIFFID: Evaluation of Six Parameterizations and Refinement of Ozone Decay Process Across Plant Functional Types

Lingfeng Li, Bo Qiu, Siwen Zhao, Xin Miao, Chaorong Chen, Jiuyi Chen, Yueyang Ni, Xin Huang, Haishan Chen, and Weidong Guo

Abstract. Tropospheric ozone (O3) is a major air pollutant that threatens vegetation productivity and terrestrial ecosystems. Quantifying O3-induced impacts on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance is crucial for understanding biosphere-atmosphere interactions at regional and global scales. In recent decades, several parameterization schemes have been developed to describe the photosynthetic and stomatal responses to O3 exposure. However, substantial discrepancies remain when applying different schemes in various model frameworks. In this study, we integrated six flux-based O3-vegetation damage parameterizations into SSiB4/TRIFFID, a well-established dynamic global vegetation model, to assess the impacts of O3 pollution on vegetation photosynthesis in China during the 2010s. Our results indicate that O3 pollution led to approximately a 20 % reduction in GPP during the 2010s, with discrepancies ranging from 15 % to 31 % across different schemes. Comparison of the O3 damage schemes revealed substantial differences in plant O3 sensitivity across schemes and plant functional types (PFTs). When evaluated against observations, the newly developed L2024 parameterization—which features non‑linear response formulations—and the trait‑informed approaches based on leaf mass per area (LMA) both reproduce observed O3 sensitivity more closely, as reflected in their consistently smaller biases. This improved performance can be attributed to the inclusion of a broader range of observational and experimental data, as well as key physiological parameters (e.g., LMA) to better capture O3 sensitivity. Furthermore, we found that the L2024 scheme exhibited strong inhibition of photosynthesis in the late growing season due to cumulative O3 exposure. By refining the "decay" process of O3 accumulation using leaf lifespan parameters and applying the "decay" and "healing" processes across all PFTs, we improved the spatial and temporal distribution of gross primary productivity (GPP) simulations. This study highlights the importance of observations and physiological insights in developing O3-vegetation damage parameterizations. Future efforts should focus on expanding observational and experimental data on O3 responses in China’s natural ecosystems to enhance O3 damage assessment and model development.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Lingfeng Li, Bo Qiu, Siwen Zhao, Xin Miao, Chaorong Chen, Jiuyi Chen, Yueyang Ni, Xin Huang, Haishan Chen, and Weidong Guo

Status: open (until 13 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Lingfeng Li, Bo Qiu, Siwen Zhao, Xin Miao, Chaorong Chen, Jiuyi Chen, Yueyang Ni, Xin Huang, Haishan Chen, and Weidong Guo
Lingfeng Li, Bo Qiu, Siwen Zhao, Xin Miao, Chaorong Chen, Jiuyi Chen, Yueyang Ni, Xin Huang, Haishan Chen, and Weidong Guo
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Ground-level ozone can harm plant photosynthesis, but models describe these effects in different ways. In this study, we implemented six ozone damage schemes in a land surface model and compared their behaviour within a unified framework. We also improved one scheme by using observations of leaf lifespan to better represent how ozone stress accumulates and recovers in plants. This work helps identify key differences among schemes and supports the development of more realistic models.
Share