Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-132
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-132
23 Mar 2026
 | 23 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Regularisation of the 4DEnVar Data Assimilation method for Calibration of Land Surface Models

Natalie Douglas, Simon Beylat, Tristan Quaife, Philippe Peylin, Nina Raoult, and Ross Bannister

Abstract. The four-dimensional ensemble variational (4DEnVar) data assimilation method is an attractive choice for land surface model calibration due to its ease of use, speed, and its circumvention of tangent linear model and adjoint calculations. However, in certain circumstances, this method may prove ineffective when implemented with a highly non-linear model, leading to out-of-range or non-physical posterior parameter values. To address this, the 4DEnVar cost function can be adapted through the introduction of a hyperparameter, which inflates the weight of the background term. In this study, we explore the anticipated challenges of applying 4DEnVar with in situ eddy-covariance flux measurements and present some explanations of the expected behaviour. We show that, when using a hyperparameter to regularise the optimisation, 4DEnVar is able to successfully calibrate two complex land surface models, JULES and ORCHIDEE, with comparable accuracy in its ability to produce model runs with an improved match to the observations. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to compare parameter calibration of two different land surface models in the same experimental setting. In addition to the aforementioned benefits of using 4DEnVar, we show that the method also exhibits considerable versatility, not only with regard to the land surface model to which it is applied, but also in terms of parameter set selection and ensemble size.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Natalie Douglas, Simon Beylat, Tristan Quaife, Philippe Peylin, Nina Raoult, and Ross Bannister

Status: open (until 18 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Natalie Douglas, Simon Beylat, Tristan Quaife, Philippe Peylin, Nina Raoult, and Ross Bannister

Model code and software

Code for processing JULES model runs Natalie Douglas https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19001565

Code for ORCHIDEE model Simon Beylat https://doi.org/10.14768/c68bc728-da71-4383-84df-dcde31d9c006

Code for processing ORCHIDEE model runs Simon Beylat https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14609416

Natalie Douglas, Simon Beylat, Tristan Quaife, Philippe Peylin, Nina Raoult, and Ross Bannister
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
This study investigates a statistical method, called 4DEnVar, to calibrate uncertain land surface model parameters against observations. This method is easy to use but can lead to unphysical parameter values. The study explores the causes of this while proposing a simple way to overcome the problem. We show that the 4DEnVar method exhibits considerable versatility by applying the method to two different land surface models, under different settings, to calibrate photosynthetic parameters.
Share