Simulation of sliding deadwood logs in mountain forests: towards a quantitative hazard assessment
Abstract. Deadwood is an integral component of mountain forests, supporting biodiversity and contributing to protection against gravitational hazards. However, under specific conditions, deadwood may itself become a hazard when mobilised and transported downslope. Although sliding logs have been repeatedly observed in steep forests, a quantitative framework to assess their hazard potential has so far been lacking. We present a physics-based model to simulate the motion and runout of sliding deadwood logs in complex terrain. The model extends an existing rockfall simulation framework based on nonsmooth rigid-body dynamics with hard contact laws and Coulomb friction, explicitly representing deadwood log geometries and interactions with terrain, standing trees, and protective structures. Model calibration and evaluation are performed using two recent Swiss case studies in which deadwood logs up to 35 m in length travelled several hundred metres in a single rapid descent and impacted infrastructure. Simulations indicate that sliding deadwood hazard is favoured by very steep slopes >35°, wet surface conditions, and a narrow decay-stage window characterised by the loss of bark and branches to reduce sliding friction while still retaining sufficient structural strength. Sliding trajectories are strongly controlled by micro-topography, with preferential paths along gullies, while standing trees limit downslope propagation but increase lateral spread through repeated deflections. The proposed model highlights the importance of adaptive forest management in mountain forests and provides a quantitative basis for optimising the balance between the protective and hazardous roles of deadwood.
The authors address a very interesting and understudied topic: the movement of deadwood in mountain forests. I found the manuscript engaging and the results highly interesting. The methodology is very solid and clearly presented. The authors also demonstrate good awareness of the limitations of their model and provide a thoughtful outlook for future studies. I particularly appreciated the in-depth analysis of the two case studies used to validate the new model.
I strongly recommend this paper for publication, subject to a few minor comments:
- All figures could be improved. In the maps, some symbols are difficult to distinguish and would benefit from being thicker or more visible.
- Lines 257–259: I appreciate that tree species is discussed first, but I would also suggest mentioning height above the ground, which is closely related to ground contact. This variable is especially interesting, though also challenging, because it may change during the first years after tree fall, for example as branches break. In addition, slope exposure could be worth considering: does a south-facing slope versus a north-facing slope make a difference? This may also be linked to differences in temperature and humidity.
Nice work, and congratulations to all the authors.