the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Simulation of sliding deadwood logs in mountain forests: towards a quantitative hazard assessment
Abstract. Deadwood is an integral component of mountain forests, supporting biodiversity and contributing to protection against gravitational hazards. However, under specific conditions, deadwood may itself become a hazard when mobilised and transported downslope. Although sliding logs have been repeatedly observed in steep forests, a quantitative framework to assess their hazard potential has so far been lacking. We present a physics-based model to simulate the motion and runout of sliding deadwood logs in complex terrain. The model extends an existing rockfall simulation framework based on nonsmooth rigid-body dynamics with hard contact laws and Coulomb friction, explicitly representing deadwood log geometries and interactions with terrain, standing trees, and protective structures. Model calibration and evaluation are performed using two recent Swiss case studies in which deadwood logs up to 35 m in length travelled several hundred metres in a single rapid descent and impacted infrastructure. Simulations indicate that sliding deadwood hazard is favoured by very steep slopes >35°, wet surface conditions, and a narrow decay-stage window characterised by the loss of bark and branches to reduce sliding friction while still retaining sufficient structural strength. Sliding trajectories are strongly controlled by micro-topography, with preferential paths along gullies, while standing trees limit downslope propagation but increase lateral spread through repeated deflections. The proposed model highlights the importance of adaptive forest management in mountain forests and provides a quantitative basis for optimising the balance between the protective and hazardous roles of deadwood.
- Preprint
(10739 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 04 Jun 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-130', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Apr 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joël Borner, 06 May 2026
reply
Dear anonymous referee,
We sincerely thank you for the positive and encouraging evaluation of our manuscript. We are grateful for the appreciation of the topic, methodology, model limitations, and the analysis of the two case studies. We also thank the referee for the constructive comments, which we fully agree with. We will update the manuscript as follows once we have received the second referee report and the editor’s decision:
- Figures: We will revise all figures with particular attention to the visibility of map symbols. We will increase the size of markers, use stronger outlines and apply higher-contrast colours. For the standing trees, which are currently shown to scale according to their DBH, we will add a clearly indicated scaling factor to make them more visible while preserving the relative differences in tree size.
- Relationship between height above ground and decay rate: We agree that height above ground is a potentially relevant factor that is often associated with, but not identical to, direct ground contact. We will expand the discussion accordingly. Although studies addressing a direct relationship between height above ground and decay rate are scarce, distance to the ground may affect local moisture conditions and accessibility for microbial colonisation, particularly at low heights and where dense vegetation, such as shrubs, tall herbs or grasses, surrounds the dead stems. This has, for example, been discussed and tested by Perez et al. (2022), who included sample distance to ground as a potential predictor of deadwood decay. While they did not find a significant effect, they noted that this variable was measured only at the time of sampling, although it is temporally variable, and that multi-year averages may better represent the conditions experienced by a log throughout the decay process. This is particularly relevant for our context, as branches may break and the stem may settle closer to the ground over time, potentially increasing moisture availability and contact with decomposer communities and thereby accelerating decay.
- Relationship between slope exposure and decay rate: In the revised version, we will also add slope exposure as a relevant but complex site factor. As correctly pointed out by you, exposure can influence both temperature and moisture, which may have opposing effects on decay rates. South-facing slopes may favour decay through higher temperatures and longer biologically active periods. However, they may also lead to faster drying of stems, potentially constraining decomposition, whereas north-facing slopes may favour decay through higher humidity and more favourable conditions for fungal activity (Bardelli et al., 2018).
References
Bardelli, T., Ascher-Jenull, J., Burkia Stocker, E., Fornasier, F., Arfaioli, P., Fravolini, G., Alves Medeiros, L. R., Egli, M., Pietramellara, G., Insam, H., & Gómez-Brandón, M. (2018). Impact of slope exposure on chemical and microbiological properties of Norway spruce deadwood and underlying soil during early stages of decomposition in the Italian Alps. Catena, 167, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.031Perez, S. B., Fraterrigo, J. M., & Dalling, J. W. (2022). Interspecific wood trait variation predicts decreased carbon residence time in changing forests. Functional Ecology, 36, 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13936
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joël Borner, 06 May 2026
reply
Model code and software
Sliding Deadwood Geometry Generator Joël Borner https://github.com/joelborner/sliding_deadwood_geometry
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 425 | 222 | 37 | 684 | 42 | 48 |
- HTML: 425
- PDF: 222
- XML: 37
- Total: 684
- BibTeX: 42
- EndNote: 48
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The authors address a very interesting and understudied topic: the movement of deadwood in mountain forests. I found the manuscript engaging and the results highly interesting. The methodology is very solid and clearly presented. The authors also demonstrate good awareness of the limitations of their model and provide a thoughtful outlook for future studies. I particularly appreciated the in-depth analysis of the two case studies used to validate the new model.
I strongly recommend this paper for publication, subject to a few minor comments:
- All figures could be improved. In the maps, some symbols are difficult to distinguish and would benefit from being thicker or more visible.
- Lines 257–259: I appreciate that tree species is discussed first, but I would also suggest mentioning height above the ground, which is closely related to ground contact. This variable is especially interesting, though also challenging, because it may change during the first years after tree fall, for example as branches break. In addition, slope exposure could be worth considering: does a south-facing slope versus a north-facing slope make a difference? This may also be linked to differences in temperature and humidity.
Nice work, and congratulations to all the authors.