Preprints
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.177100420.06303100/v1
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.177100420.06303100/v1
30 Mar 2026
 | 30 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Drivers of reduced permafrost cooling efficacy of equatorial stratospheric aerosol injection in the Eastern Arctic compared to a moderate emission pathway

Isaline Businger, Rhonda Müller, Raleigh Grysko, Jacqueline Oehri, Jin-Soo Kim, and Gabriela Schaepman-Strub

Abstract. The Arctic is warming about four times faster than the global average, with permafrost thaw representing a potential global climate tipping element. Given the insufficient rate of carbon emission reductions, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has emerged as a strategy to abate climate warming. However, its effects on permafrost thaw drivers remain uncertain. The G6sulfur experiment, part of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP6), aims to reduce radiative forcing in the high-emission scenario (ssp585) to levels comparable to those in the moderate-emission scenario (ssp245) by injecting stratospheric aerosols near the equator. Analyzing the G6sulfur results, we find that this intervention alters atmospheric circulation, modifying winds, cloud properties, and the North Atlantic Oscillation, which affect temperature patterns and longwave radiation. These changes shift the relative importance of mechanisms driving summer permafrost thaw, resulting in a distinct spatial pattern: increased thaw depth in the Eastern Hemisphere (+0.51 ± 0.07 m) and decreased thaw in the Western Hemisphere (-0.26 ± 0.06 m), compared to the ssp245 scenario targeted by the intervention. While G6sulfur reduces radiative forcing to levels similar to ssp245 and slows permafrost decline by 2080–2099 relative to ssp585 (+4.61 ± 0.21 × 106 km2), it fails to preserve as much permafrost area as ssp245 (-1.08 ± 0.18 × 106 km2). By altering the drivers of permafrost dynamics, G6sulfur creates spatial variations in thaw patterns, resulting in an overall reduction in permafrost area compared to ssp245. Our findings underscore the need to better understand and optimize SAI deployment to avoid unintended regional impacts.

Share
Isaline Businger, Rhonda Müller, Raleigh Grysko, Jacqueline Oehri, Jin-Soo Kim, and Gabriela Schaepman-Strub

Status: open (until 11 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Isaline Businger, Rhonda Müller, Raleigh Grysko, Jacqueline Oehri, Jin-Soo Kim, and Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
Isaline Businger, Rhonda Müller, Raleigh Grysko, Jacqueline Oehri, Jin-Soo Kim, and Gabriela Schaepman-Strub
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
The Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the world, causing permafrost — frozen ground — to thaw and release gases that accelerate climate change. Because emissions are not falling quickly enough, ways to cool the planet by reflecting sunlight back to space are being explored. Using climate model experiments, we study how this could affect permafrost. We find it could slow overall loss later this century, but shift thaw patterns, reducing it in some regions while increasing it in others.
Share