Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1248
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1248
17 Mar 2026
 | 17 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Quantifying calibration drift in low-cost PM10 and sound sensors across contrasting indoor environments

Oliver Stroh, Geb Thomas, and Thomas M. Peters

Abstract. Low-cost sensor networks offer an affordable option for long-term air quality and noise monitoring, but their performance can be limited by calibration drift. This study quantified drift in low-cost particulate matter (PM) and sound level sensors using measurements from three co-located units and reference instruments deployed in two contrasting indoor environments: a lower-concentration painting environment and a higher-concentration swine environment. Drift varied substantially by environment. In the painting environment, drift in both PM10 and sound sensors was small (PM10: 2.1 μg m-3 per year; sound: 0.78 dBA per year) and either within or near expected performance ranges based on manufacturer specifications and sound level tolerance criteria. In the swine environment, PM10 sensors exhibited rapid degradation (−46.2 μg m-3 per year), indicating substantial time-dependent drift under elevated particulate concentrations. Incorporating a drift term in the calibration model reduced RMSE and MAE by approximately 11 % in the swine environment, with negligible improvements in the painting environment. Sound sensors showed minimal drift and strong inter-sensor agreement across both deployments. These findings highlight the need for environment-specific recalibration strategies for low-cost PM sensors and demonstrate that drift-aware modelling can improve measurement reliability and support maintenance and lifecycle planning in high-concentration settings, with future work investigating how particulate characteristics and operating conditions influence drift.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Oliver Stroh, Geb Thomas, and Thomas M. Peters

Status: open (until 22 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Oliver Stroh, Geb Thomas, and Thomas M. Peters

Data sets

Data and Code for: Quantifying calibration drift in low-cost PM10 and sound sensors across contrasting indoor environments Oliver Stroh https://doi.org/10.17632/6dyv3bvysf.1

Model code and software

Data and Code for: Quantifying calibration drift in low-cost PM10 and sound sensors across contrasting indoor environments Oliver Stroh https://doi.org/10.17632/6dyv3bvysf.1

Oliver Stroh, Geb Thomas, and Thomas M. Peters

Viewed

Total article views: 64 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
47 14 3 64 2 2
  • HTML: 47
  • PDF: 14
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 64
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Mar 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Mar 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 64 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 64 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Low-cost sensors are widely used to monitor air pollution and environmental noise but may lose accuracy over time. This study evaluated changes in sensor accuracy by comparing three low-cost particulate matter and sound sensors with co-located reference instruments in two indoor environments. Substantial particulate matter sensor drift occurred in a high-concentration environment, whereas minimal drift in particulate matter and sound sensors occurred in a lower-concentration environment.
Share