Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1230
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1230
17 Mar 2026
 | 17 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Further constraining the role of in-atmosphere production on the global HFC-23 budget

Ben Adam, Rayne Holland, Daniel Van Hoomissen, James B. Burkholder, Anwar Khan, Paul Griffiths, Jens Mühle, Dudley Shallcross, and Matt Rigby

Abstract. A large discrepancy of at least 10 Gg yr-1 exists between reported emissions of the potent greenhouse gas HFC-23 (CHF3, trifluoromethane) and emissions derived from atmospheric measurements. In-atmosphere production of HFC-23 from the breakdown of fluorinated source gases such as hydrofluorocarbons and hydrofluoroolefins contributes to this gap, but the magnitude of this source is weakly constrained. This uncertainty is due, in part, to limited experimental measurements of the photolysis quantum yield of trifluoroacetaldehyde (CF3CHO), a key degradation product which forms HFC-23 via photolysis. The parameters governing CF3CHO deposition are also poorly understood. Previous work reported an upper limit of the contribution of the in-atmosphere source to the global HFC-23 burden. Here, we use a 3D chemistry and transport model to further constrain this contribution, using recent estimates of source gas emissions, kinetic rate constants, photolysis rates and deposition parameters, as well as considering the uncertainties in these values. We find that in-atmosphere production of HFC-23 is in the range 0.013–0.035 Gg yr−1, significantly lower than previous estimates. This accounts for <0.5 % of the discrepancy between reported emissions and those derived from atmospheric observations, suggesting that this source makes a negligible contribution to the overall HFC-23 budget. As part of this work, we also calculate indirect global warming potentials for the HFC-23 source gases HFO-1234ze(E), HFO-1336mzz(Z) and HCFO-1233zd(E) and find that their impact on climate is up to ten times higher than previously reported.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ben Adam, Rayne Holland, Daniel Van Hoomissen, James B. Burkholder, Anwar Khan, Paul Griffiths, Jens Mühle, Dudley Shallcross, and Matt Rigby

Status: open (until 28 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ben Adam, Rayne Holland, Daniel Van Hoomissen, James B. Burkholder, Anwar Khan, Paul Griffiths, Jens Mühle, Dudley Shallcross, and Matt Rigby
Ben Adam, Rayne Holland, Daniel Van Hoomissen, James B. Burkholder, Anwar Khan, Paul Griffiths, Jens Mühle, Dudley Shallcross, and Matt Rigby
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Some man-made gases emitted into the atmosphere can break down to form a powerful greenhouse gas called HFC-23. In this study, we use a full three-dimensional model of the atmosphere and its chemistry to improve on previous work and determine how much HFC-23 is produced from this route. Our model estimates HFC-23 production ten times lower than previously suggested, confirming that this source is a very small contributor to the total amount of HFC-23 in the atmosphere.
Share