Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-114
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-114
21 Jan 2026
 | 21 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Characterizing emissions, chemistry, and health impacts of aged wildfire smoke in a western US city

Lixu Jin, Lu Tan, Damien T. Ketcherside, Vanessa Selimovic, Keri Nauman, Robert J. Yokelson, and Lu Hu

Abstract. We report hourly surface observations of PM2.5, CO, NOx, O3, and 75 speciated VOCs in Missoula, Montana, during a strong smoke event in 2020. This study tests our current understanding of wildfire emissions, chemistry, and health effects as implemented in the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. Three-or-more-day-old smoke transported from California and the Pacific Northwest increased CO, PM2.5, and total measured VOCs by factors of 2–8, with hourly maxima of 800 ppb, 120 µg m-3, and 85 ppb, respectively. In contrast, NOx levels were not elevated compared to the urban background. O3 showed a non-monotonic response to wildfire smoke: MDA8 O3 increased under light smoke but flattened or declined when PM2.5 exceeded ~30–40 µg m-3, a feature that GEOS-Chem failed to reproduce. A 2020-style wildfire season recurring annually would yield an excess lifetime cancer risk of 100-in-1 million or approximately 7 times the non-smoke baseline. The noncancer hazard index (HI) would reach 3.0, meaning substantially elevated acute risks during high-smoke periods. About 90 % of cancer risks are from PM2.5, whereas non-cancer risks are dominated by formaldehyde, benzene, acrolein, and acetaldehyde. GEOS-Chem captured major smoke intrusions but underestimated CO, PM2.5, and VOCs by 30–90 %. These model biases propagate to health metrics, with GEOS-Chem underestimating smoke-attributable cancer risk by ~40 % and chronic HI by ~10 times. We attribute the model errors to underpredicted fire emissions and unrepresented VOC chemistry, which together led to an overestimation of OH and insufficient secondary production.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Lixu Jin, Lu Tan, Damien T. Ketcherside, Vanessa Selimovic, Keri Nauman, Robert J. Yokelson, and Lu Hu

Status: open (until 04 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Lixu Jin, Lu Tan, Damien T. Ketcherside, Vanessa Selimovic, Keri Nauman, Robert J. Yokelson, and Lu Hu
Lixu Jin, Lu Tan, Damien T. Ketcherside, Vanessa Selimovic, Keri Nauman, Robert J. Yokelson, and Lu Hu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
We measured air pollution hour by hour in a United States city during a wildfire-smoke episode in 2020 and compared it with a computer air-quality model. Ozone increased in light smoke but leveled off or declined in heavy smoke, a pattern the model missed. The model also underestimated smoke pollution and the resulting cancer and short-term health risks, showing that better representations of wildfire emissions and smoke chemistry are needed for reliable forecasts and risk assessment.
Share