Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-108
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-108
15 Jan 2026
 | 15 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Spatial heterogeneity of sedimentary organic carbon in fjords around Stavanger, Norway – implications for upscaling

Markus Diesing, Reidulv Bøe, Sigrid Elvenes, Jochen Knies, and Craig Smeaton

Abstract. Fjords are steep sided glacially carved troughs that have been inundated by the sea. Several global assessments have aimed to establish the role of fjords in the carbon cycle. According to these studies, fjords bury 18 Tg of organic carbon per year, 55 % to 62 % of that organic carbon is terrestrially sourced and 61 ± 16 % of the organic carbon in fjord sediments is thermally labile. Such quantitative estimates, while important for understanding the role of fjords in the global carbon cycle, often rest on data compilations that might not be representative for fjord environments as a whole and assumptions that might not hold. To test such assumptions, we present a local case study from fjords around Stavanger (Norway). Based on detailed investigations, we show that the seabed is heterogeneous in terms of substrate types covering the full grain-size spectrum from mud to boulders. Seabed areas where fine-grained sediment, and hence organic carbon, accumulates account for 50 % of the area while the remainder is characterised by coarse-grained sediment indicating erosion and transport. In depositional areas, rates of organic carbon accumulation vary between 18.7 g m2 yr1 and 82.6 g m2 yr1 and stocks from 0.1 kg m2 and 1.37 kg m2. The fraction of labile organic matter varies between 19 % and 44 %, while δ13C-values of the organic carbon fraction range from 27.44 ‰ to 21.23 ‰, indicating a strong variability of the sources of organic carbon over a comparatively small area. Taken together, these results attest to high environmental variability and spatial heterogeneity in the study site, putting several assumptions used in global assessments into question. We suggest steps to achieve more realistic results when upscaling from local studies to a higher level. Using available data on organic carbon accumulation rates from Norwegian coastal areas, we demonstrate how local results could be upscaled in a more robust way. We arrive at a tentative estimate of 0.41 –3.68 Tg yr1 of organic carbon accumulating in surface sediments (upper 10 cm) of fjords in mainland Norway.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Markus Diesing, Reidulv Bøe, Sigrid Elvenes, Jochen Knies, and Craig Smeaton

Status: open (until 26 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Markus Diesing, Reidulv Bøe, Sigrid Elvenes, Jochen Knies, and Craig Smeaton

Data sets

Input data to spatially predict organic carbon stocks, carbon reactivity index and delta 13C in fjords around Stavanger, Norway M. Diesing and C. Smeaton https://zenodo.org/records/18172827

Model code and software

Stavanger_organic_carbon M. Diesing https://github.com/diesing-ngu/Stavanger_organic_carbon

Markus Diesing, Reidulv Bøe, Sigrid Elvenes, Jochen Knies, and Craig Smeaton
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 15 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
We investigate accumulation rates, stocks, provenance and lability of sedimentary organic carbon in fjords around Stavanger, Norway. We find that all measured parameters show high variability and spatial heterogeneity over short spatial scales. Our results call into question assumptions that are made when upscaling local studies for global assessments. We propose steps to better account for spatial heterogeneity when upscaling to higher levels.
Share