the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
NUKLEUS – A First Kilometre Scale Multi-model Climate Ensemble for Germany: Evaluation
Abstract. This study presents the evaluation of NUKLEUS, the first kilometre-scale, multi-model convection-permitting regional climate ensemble (CPM) for Germany. Three state-of-the-art regional climate models (ICON-CLM, COSMO-CLM, and REMO) were run at ~3 km horizontal resolution using a two-step downscaling chain driven by ERA5 reanalysis. The ensemble provides high-resolution climate information for Central Europe. In particular, we evaluate the CPM simulation results for Germany with a focus on six representative pilot regions selected within the German RegIKlim programme. Temperature, precipitation, global radiation, and near-surface wind, including their spatial patterns, annual and diurnal cycles, distributional characteristics, are compared to observational datasets. Moreover, selected climate indices relevant for heat and precipitation extremes are analysed. Overall, the ensemble demonstrates substantial added value compared to coarser-scale regional climate modelling, particularly in capturing regional climatic features and fine-scale variability. Temperature is reproduced with small biases (mostly within ± 0.5 K), with ICON-CLM performing best, while COSMO-CLM shows a weak cold bias and REMO a warm bias in parts of southern Germany. The CPM models realistically capture daily temperature distributions, though REMO underestimates minimum-temperature extremes. The annual cycle of precipitation is generally well represented, but all CPM models tend to overestimate totals in several regions, e.g., REMO exhibits a distinct spatial bias pattern with stronger deviations along topographic gradients. Extreme precipitation frequencies are generally overestimated, while regional contrasts such as stronger extremes in mountainous regions are preserved. Diurnal cycles show deficiencies specific to the models, including timing errors of afternoon precipitation peaks and misrepresentation of nocturnal precipitation revivals. For global radiation, ICON-CLM achieves the smallest biases, benefiting from its modern radiation scheme (ecRad), whereas COSMO-CLM and REMO show region specific over- and underestimations linked to cloud representation. 10 m wind speed diurnal cycles are best simulated by ICON-CLM, which captures the nocturnal wind minimum, while COSMO-CLM and REMO generally overestimate nighttime wind. Climate indices reveal underestimation of heat-related metrics (summer days and hot days) and systematic overestimation of heavy precipitation indices, although spatial patterns and regional differences are reproduced. In summary, we conclude that NUKLEUS provides valuable climate information for Germany, supporting climate-impact assessments and adaptation planning at municipal to regional scales.
- Preprint
(2669 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3325 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 05 Aug 2026)
- CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1024 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jun 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 113 | 30 | 7 | 150 | 12 | 7 | 7 |
- HTML: 113
- PDF: 30
- XML: 7
- Total: 150
- Supplement: 12
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
Namely, there are two outstanding issues in your manuscript which need to be addressed. First, the exact version of the ICON model used for your work should be stored in a private repository and cited. Other versions of the model do not ensure the replicability of the results presented in your work. This can be for example a Zenodo private repository.
Also, you do not provide repositories for the input datasets used in your work, and you must do it.
Additionally, it is necessary that you provide better information and details about the data files produced in your work. Currently, the DKRZ hosts more than 614,000 files that respond to the NUKLEUS keyword and it is not possible to identify the ones that correspond to your work.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor