Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1018
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1018
06 Mar 2026
 | 06 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).

Alluvial river-channel width: transient adjustment and dynamic equilibrium

Andrew D. Wickert, Jabari C. Jones, Devon Libby, Phillip H. Larson, Katherine R. Barnhart, Maximillian S. Van Wyk de Vries, and Taylor F. Schildgen

Abstract. Alluvial river channels naturally widen and narrow as large floods scour banks and smaller ones supply sediments that help build bars and channel margins. Despite substantial advances into the controls on the equilibrium width of river channels, relatively little theory underpins our knowledge on transient river-channel-width evolution. Such a knowledge gap inhibits us from predicting the impacts of present-day nonstationary hydrology on river-channel stability and geomorphic change. Here we present a unified approach to model transient channel widening, via erosion of cohesive banks and mobilization of noncohesive clasts, and narrowing, via lateral diffusion of sediment that attaches to the banks. The resultant model can take a full hydrograph as input, allowing the hydraulic geometry and associated "geomorphically effective" water discharge to emerge dynamically. Stable widths develop via the inverse relationship between channel width and flow depth, and therefore, shear stress on the channel margins. Equilibrium solutions closely approximate data and theory on channels with both gravel and mud banks, and we compare transient solutions to the rapidly widening Minnesota and Cannon Rivers (Minnesota, USA) and the narrowing Green River and Diamond Fork (Utah, USA). Documented Python source code to run these computations is available from GitHub and Zenodo via the "OTTAR" package, and may be installed via pip from PyPI.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Andrew D. Wickert, Jabari C. Jones, Devon Libby, Phillip H. Larson, Katherine R. Barnhart, Maximillian S. Van Wyk de Vries, and Taylor F. Schildgen

Status: open (until 17 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Andrew D. Wickert, Jabari C. Jones, Devon Libby, Phillip H. Larson, Katherine R. Barnhart, Maximillian S. Van Wyk de Vries, and Taylor F. Schildgen

Model code and software

OTTAR A. D. Wickert https://github.com/MNiMORPH/OTTAR

Andrew D. Wickert, Jabari C. Jones, Devon Libby, Phillip H. Larson, Katherine R. Barnhart, Maximillian S. Van Wyk de Vries, and Taylor F. Schildgen
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Some rivers are wide. Others are narrow. Why is this, and do they change over time? To answer these questions, we developed a model and tested it against real rivers. Rivers erode bank materials to widen, but transported sediments can settle on and rebuild the banks. Rivers generally widen during large floods and narrow during moderate ones. We demonstrate how changing streamflow alters river-channel width over time, with implications for erosion and flood hazards.
Share