the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Juice/SWI during the Lunar-Earth-Gravity-Assist (LEGA). I. General overview
Abstract. The Jupiter Icy moons Explorer (Juice) was the first spacecraft ever that performed a combined gravity assist using 20 both the Moon and Earth in succession. The double flyby required highly precise navigation to succeed. The LEGA allowed Juice to make a shortcut through the inner solar system on its way to Jupiter, using less fuel than would have been otherwise required. On August 19, 2024, Juice had its closest approach to the Moon. This first part of the manoeuvre accelerated the spacecraft by approximately 0.9 km/s relative to the Sun. On August 20, 2024, the spacecraft swung past Earth. This second part of the manoeuvre reduced the spacecraft's speed by 4.8 km/s relative to the Sun. This was a unique opportunity for its payloads to observe the Moon and Earth from a close distance as both calibration and science targets. The Submillimetre Wave Instrument (SWI), a dual channel heterodyne spectrometer observed both targets in two far-infrared bands around 500 and 250 μm wavelength in order to characterize and calibrate the overall performance of the instrument, including its receiver frontend, spectrometer backend and telescope mechanisms. In addition, the commanding pipeline and operations processes of the instrument were also tested close to its full range of flexibility using the relevant pipelines. In this paper we provide a contextual description of physical and functional characteristics of SWI, its operational principles and in-flight calibration activities during LEGA.
- Preprint
(921 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Apr 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1011', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Mar 2026
reply
-
RC2: 'RC2', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Apr 2026
reply
The authors give a brief description of Juice/SWI and the main findings from LEGA. Hence the manuscript does not contain any scientific results about the Earth or the Moon, but rather an in-flight characterization of the instrument. This information is essential for answering the question, whether the scientific program can be executed as planned upon arrival at the Jupiter system.
Two major defects of SWI were identified that jeopardize its ability to meet the requirements:
- The flux calibration mechanism can carry out only 5% of the planned number of calibration cycles.
- The Ultra Stable Oscillator changes its frequency, when the Frequency Distribution Module changes its temperature.
These problems, however, are discussed in greater detail in other contributions to the same, special issue.
I suggest the following, technical corrections.
- Line 60: There is no Hartogh et al. 2026 in the list of references, only a 2026a. On the other hand, there is no 2026b among the references, either.
- Line 73: Delete "a".
- Line 92: There is no "M5R" in the Figure, only "M5L" and "M5T".
- References: Replace "??, ??" with "this issue".
- I support the last comment by anonymous referee #1 - the answer to his question interests me as well.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1011-RC2 -
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Apr 2026
reply
I agree with all comments of the rewiever 2
Indeed, we don't have a plan for all the articles./ chapters . This section (I) covers a General Overview ; I assumed that the details would be developed in other chapters/ articles.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1011-RC3
-
RC2: 'RC2', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Apr 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 124 | 48 | 17 | 189 | 16 | 19 |
- HTML: 124
- PDF: 48
- XML: 17
- Total: 189
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Very nice instrument; excellent, complete and clear paper ! just minors suggestions to the authors :
line 65 :: "the multiplying circuit is also called frequency mixer" : why mixer ? would-I suggest "Source" ??,
line 68 : to explain the acronyme FDM ?
line 72 : this warm LO part , could we use "warm" LO or ambiant temperature LO ?
line 100 : is-it a offset telescope ? to mention it ?
line 118 : relate t particular calibration.. : I suppose it is : relate to particular...
line 121 : FIR signals , could w say FIR/submm signals ?
line 140 : the satellite contractor : must we use : the spacecraft....?
line 153 : to explain the acronyme NECP ?
line 197 + : here is a measured diagram ? would it be interesting to put it in the place ?
line 244 : please indicates Observatoire de Paris , LERMA -site de Paris (now called LIRA)
Nb : just a question , line 205 : using the Sun ...would it be possible to make a deconvolution ?