Three-dimensional structure of sub-mesoscale eddies on the continental shelf
Abstract. Sub-mesoscale eddies are oceanic features crucial for energy transfer processes, transport of heat and biogeochemical tracers, and for promoting diversity in marine ecosystems. Their small length scales (<20 km) and short lifespans (O~days), make their characterization challenging using field measurements. In this paper, we combined remote sensing, ocean glider, shipborne, and mooring data to investigate the internal structure and dynamical properties of sub-mesoscale eddies and peddies ('petite' eddies; diameters ≤10 km extending through the water column) along the Wadjemup (Rottnest) Continental Shelf (WCS), Western Australia. Data collected in August 2010 showed an anti-cyclonic mesoscale eddy spawning several cyclonic, cold core sub-mesoscale eddies that promoted upwelling (vertical extension ~185 m) with maxima in chlorophyll concentration at the centre. Results suggested that sub-mesoscale eddies drive chlorophyll advection either at (in) their periphery (centre) of cyclonic eddies, or at their interfaces. In general, cyclonic eddies promoted upwelling and anti-cyclonic eddies promoted downwelling; however, our data also showed that upwelling conditions could also occur in anti-cyclonic eddies. Winds were found to affect the internal structure and lifecycle of sub-mesoscale eddies, particularly under strong wind (speeds > 7 ms-1) conditions, through upwelling and/or vertical mixing. In the presence of dense shelf water outflows along the continental shelf, sub-mesoscale eddies were found to trap, upwell, and transport denser nearshore waters off the continental shelf. This unique dataset provided a detailed picture of the three-dimensional structure of sub-mesoscale eddies, including the characterization of sub-surface eddies, and contributes to the understanding of their role in chlorophyll advection in shelf and coastal environments.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors serves as editor for the special issue to which this paper belongs.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.