the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Estimation of Nocturnal Boundary Layer Height in the Central Amazon, Supported by Gas Concentration Profiles
Abstract. The height of the nocturnal boundary layer (hn) is a fundamental parameter for weather and climate prediction. However, because turbulent processes weaken at night, estimating hn remains challenging. In addition, our understanding of its variability is limited, especially due to the predominant use of indirect methods that do not always accurately reflect the physical definition of the boundary layer. In this study we used micrometeorological measurements collected at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory, in central Amazon. These measurements enable the study of turbulent sensible heat flux (H) profiles from the canopy top up to 300 m above ground, from which hn can be defined. Our analysis focused on the seasonal differences between dry and wet periods for a La Nina year and an El Nino year. also, we explore how variations in hn affect the vertical distribution of CO and CH4 concentrations. The results revealed significant variations, such as: largest values of hn were observed during the wet season of a year marked by the La Niña phenomenon (~ 270 m +/- 40 m), while smallest values of hn occurred in the dry season associated with El Niño (~ 100 m +/- 27 m). It was also observed that hn can act as a "barrier" to the entry or exit of air masses with high concentrations of CO and CH4. This study provides important insights into the variability of hn above the Amazon forest, with implications for improving parameterizations in atmospheric models.
- Preprint
(13720 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2175 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 Feb 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6531', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jan 2026
reply
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carla Souza, 28 Jan 2026
reply
Dear Reviewer and Editor,
We would like to thank the reviewer for their careful evaluation of our manuscript and constructive comments.
We would like to emphasize that all the points raised by the reviewer are feasible with the experimental data set available at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO). Some of this data has already been used in the manuscript, and the suggestions made by the reviewer can easily be addressed in the manuscript revision process.
We agree that incorporating a more detailed discussion (going a little deeper than what is already in the current version of the manuscript) on stability, radiative cooling, turbulence, canopy effects, and background trace gas conditions will improve the physical interpretation of the Amazonian nighttime boundary layer. This deeper discussion of the results will certainly be included during the manuscript review process.
Sincerely,
Carla Souza and Cléo Quaresma
on behalf of all co-authorsCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6531-CC1
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Carla Souza, 28 Jan 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135 | 51 | 12 | 198 | 18 | 7 | 12 |
- HTML: 135
- PDF: 51
- XML: 12
- Total: 198
- Supplement: 18
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The manuscript adresses a interesting topic; however, more in-depth research into the physics and in-canopy processes is required (See review).