MRDF-Net: A Model with Multidimensional Reconstruction Convolution and Dynamic Force Unit for Radar Nowcasting
Abstract. Accurately predicting rapid weather changes is essential for meteorological services and disaster prevention, an area typically addressed by radar nowcasting. However, achieving accurate and stable predictions over extended forecasting horizons remains a challenging task due to the increasing uncertainty and error accumulation inherent in spatiotemporal sequence modeling. To address this challenge, this paper proposes MRDF-Net, a novel spatiotemporal sequence prediction model that integrates a multidimensional reconstruction convolution module with a dynamic force unit module to enhance forecasting accuracy and stability. The reconstruction convolution module adopts a dual reconstruction strategy across spatial and channel dimensions, which effectively reduces feature redundancy while preserving sensitivity to complex meteorological patterns. The dynamic force unit module, on the other hand, simplifies nonlinear operations in the self-attention mechanism to improve computational efficiency and feature representation. Experimental results demonstrate that MRDF-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance on standard short-term forecasting tasks, as measured by the Critical Success Index (CSI) and Heidke Skill Score (HSS). More notably, the model maintains its superior predictive capability in extended two-hour forecasting scenarios. MRDF-Net effectively alleviates the echo weakening commonly observed in other models by better preserving strong echo regions, resulting in more accurate predictions of detailed spatial structures. These results highlight the strong potential of MRDF-Net for operational meteorological forecasting.
Review Report
Â
Â
General Assessment
This is a well-structured and technically sound manuscript that addresses a timely and important problem in meteorological remote sensing: improving the accuracy and stability of radar-based precipitation nowcasting using advanced deep learning architectures. The proposed MRDF-Net is innovative in its combination of redundancy reduction via multidimensional reconstruction and efficient global modeling via a linearized attention mechanism. The experimental design is comprehensive, including both synthetic (Moving-MNIST) and real-world radar datasets, and the model is compared against a wide range of baseline and modern methods.
Â
However, several issues need to be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication. These include clarifications in the methodological description, more rigorous statistical validation, and improvements in the presentation of figures and results.
Â
Â
Major Concerns
      Section 3.2 introduces the radar echo dataset but lacks critical details: How were missing data or noise handled during quality control?
      The Moving-MNIST dataset is described, but no details are given on how it was generated (e.g., number of digits per frame, velocity ranges). This is necessary for reproducibility.
      The training/testing split (21,103 vs. 5,275 images) is provided, but the temporal continuity of the radar data is not discussed. Were sequences sampled randomly or chronologically? Random sampling could lead to data leakage if consecutive frames are split across sets.
      The choice of batch size (4) and learning rate (0.0001) is stated, but no justification or ablation is provided.
      The loss function used for training is not mentioned. Is it MSE, a combination of MSE and adversarial loss, or something else? This is essential for understanding the optimization process.
      The use of CSI and HSS is appropriate and well explained. However, the manuscript does not discuss whether these metrics are computed on a pixel-wise basis or after some form of spatial smoothing.
      Statistical significance testing is absent. Given the stochastic nature of deep learning training, it is important to report confidence intervals or perform significance tests (e.g., bootstrap or t-tests) to ensure that observed improvements are not due to random initialization.
      The comparison with ViViT-Prob, MF-UFNO, and RadarDiT in Section 4.2.4 is valuable, but the discussion is brief. Why does RadarDiT outperform MRDF-Net at lower thresholds? Is it due to the diffusion process better capturing large-scale patterns? This could be explored further.
      The authors claim that MRDF-Net reduces echo weakening, but this is only shown qualitatively in Figures 7 and 10. Quantitative measures of echo intensity preservation (e.g., intensity histograms or peak intensity error) would strengthen this claim.
Â
Â
Minor Issues
Â
Â
Â
Â