the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and Preliminary Validation of an EnKF-Like Image Assimilation System for the Common Land Model
Abstract. Accurate representation of both the location and magnitude of soil moisture anomalies in land surface model initial conditions is crucial for simulating land–atmosphere interactions. However, traditional point-based land data assimilation methods primarily adjust anomaly magnitude, with limited capability to improve spatial structure due to the single-column design of most land surface models. This study develops an assimilation approach that optimizes the spatial structure of soil moisture. For the Common Land Model (CoLM), soil moisture fields are treated as images, and a curvelet transform is introduced as the image observation operator. Ensemble methods are used to dynamically estimate errors in the image structure, and the background field is updated in image space using a Kalman filter framework, forming an EnKF-like land surface image assimilation system. Assimilation experiments show that this system effectively exploits the multi-scale spatial information contained in observations, improving soil moisture spatial patterns while reducing magnitude errors. After assimilation, the spatial correlation of surface soil moisture with GLDAS increases from 0.4 to 0.8, and the unbiased RMSE decreases from 0.12 to 0.06 m³/m³. Through vertical propagation, correlations rise from 0.35 to 0.55 at 10–40 cm and from 0.25 to 0.4 at 40–100 cm. Independent validation using in-situ stations shows correlation increases from 0.153 to 0.425 in China and from 0.142 to 0.504 in the United States. These results highlight the potential of the proposed system to improve land surface initial fields and strengthen weather and climate predictions.
- Preprint
(18089 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 30 Apr 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6463', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Mar 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6463/egusphere-2025-6463-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-6463-RC1 -
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6463', Nima Zafarmomen, 21 Mar 2026
reply
The manuscript has a clear methodological motivation: standard land DA is often column-wise and does not directly improve the spatial organization of soil-moisture anomalies, which matters for land–atmosphere coupling. The curvelet-based framework is also conceptually well aligned with multiscale spatial structure, and the manuscript explains this reasonably clearly with the reconstruction examples in Figure 1 and the spectral-space assimilation formulation. The paper also includes both global diagnostics and independent station-based checks, which is important. Overall, the study is interesting, potentially useful, and relevant to hydrological modeling and land data assimilation and worth publishing HESS. I will put some minor comments:
1) Please define more explicitly what makes the method “EnKF-like” rather than a standard EnKF. At present, the wording may confuse readers expecting a full ensemble state update in model space.
2) The description of the ensemble perturbation strategy for estimating BB and RR is too brief. Please state the ensemble size, perturbation distributions, and whether any localization or inflation is used.
3) Figures 3–5 are informative, but the captions could better state which fields are instantaneous and which are accumulated or averaged, to avoid ambiguity.
4) Please report the number of U.S. ISMN stations actually used after screening, as this is less explicit than for the CMA dataset.
5) The manuscript should discuss whether the method is expected to remain effective at higher spatial resolution, where fine-scale heterogeneity and representativeness errors become more important.
6) Some language needs polishing for grammar and precision. For example, there are occasional awkward phrases such as “he assimilation experiment” and repeated wording around “spatial structure.”
7)
I strongly recommend that the authors cite the following relevant study, which appears closely related to the manuscript’s topic of data assimilation for hydrologic and land-surface interactions: "Assimilation of Sentinel-Based Leaf Area Index for Modeling Surface-Ground Water Interactions in Irrigation Districts."
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6463-CC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6463', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Mar 2026
reply
This study develops an EnKF-like image assimilation system for the Common Land Model and validate the assimilation results. It is a well-motivated work with good novelty. Some minor corrections are suggested as followed:
- The content of section 3 includes the model description, but the title does not correspond. It is recommended to modify it.
- Line 160, coarsest-scale spatial features, Line 165, large-scale, Line 170, continental-scale. In this section, the author provides various descriptions of the scale names. A brief explanation of the basis for this classification is needed.
- Line 210. Is Xf stand for the variable orspectral coefficients after curvelet transformation? Please explictly state it.
- The proposed image-based method is reasonable for land assimilation. However, the authors do not show the comparision with point-based method. It is recommended to conduct a simple comparative analysis, or to address the limitations in the conclusion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6463-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 115 | 45 | 19 | 179 | 10 | 10 |
- HTML: 115
- PDF: 45
- XML: 19
- Total: 179
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1