the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Pollution transport and transformation over the Po Plain as revealed by airborne and ground-based measurements in July 2017 during EMeRGe
Abstract. Airborne measurements provide valuable information about the vertical distribution of pollutants enabling the complex transport and dispersion pathways within and above the boundary layer (BL) to be investigated. In this study, the transport of pollution within the Po Plain, a major atmospheric pollution hotspot in Europe, was explored by exploiting airborne measurements made within the EMeRGe (Effect of Megacities on the transport and transformation of pollutants on the Regional to Global scales) project in combination with in situ and ground-based remote-sensing measurements over the whole Po basin. The analysis considers three areas where pollution emission and mixing are dominated by different processes: the Gulf of Venice to the east, the central part of the Po Plain, and the Gulf of Genoa to the west. Wind fields and backward trajectories during the days of the flights indicate the impact of the sea and mountain breezes on the BL distribution of pollutants, and of synoptic scale transport above it. Overall, the extensive data set of primary and secondary trace gases and aerosols at different altitudes provides insight into the effect of vertical and horizontal dynamical mixing on the chemical processing of pollutants within the BL. In this context, mixing of pollution plumes during stagnant conditions within the BL, stratification, venting and export of pollutants towards the Adriatic coast were observed. In addition, desert dust layers of Saharan origin at different altitudes confirm the mixing of naturally occurring dust and its impact on air quality of the lowermost atmosphere over the Po Plain.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(3172 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2829 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6458', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Feb 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6458/egusphere-2025-6458-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6458', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6458/egusphere-2025-6458-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6458/egusphere-2025-6458-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6458', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Feb 2026
General comments
This manuscript presents an observational analysis of pollution transport and vertical structure over the Po Valley using airborne measurements from the EMeRGe campaign, combined with ground-based observations, trajectory calculations, and dispersion modelling. The dataset is valuable, and the manuscript is clearly relevant for the special issue. The multi-platform observational approach provides important insight into vertical layering, recirculation, and plume variability in this complex region.
The manuscript is generally well structured and the results represent a useful contribution to the interpretation of EMeRGe observations and to the broader understanding of pollution transport over the Po Plain. However, the manuscript is some times highly descriptive and would benefit from some streamlining, with a clearer synthesis of its main scientific advances. I therefore recommend publication after minor revision.
Specific comments
- Line 108: The manuscript states that one of its objectives is the identification of trans-regional and trans-boundary transport to and from the Po Plain. The presented observations and trajectory analyses clearly document regional recirculation and export towards the Adriatic and Alpine regions. However, direct evidence for cross-national impacts remains limited. It would be helpful if the authors could define more explicitly what is meant by trans-boundary transport in this study and distinguish clearly between regional recirculation and transport with potential cross-border implications.
- Line 194: This multi-tool approach is appropriate and commonly used in aircraft campaign analyses. However, the consistency between these tools is discussed mainly qualitatively. In addition, the models are driven by different meteorological datasets and resolutions. A short discussion of uncertainties would strengthen the manuscript, particularly under the weak-wind conditions typical of the Po Plain.
- Section 3 contains a detailed and comprehensive description of observed plumes and vertical structures. While this level of detail is valuable, the main conceptual conclusions sometimes remain implicit. In several places the text describes individual plume segments without clearly summarising the broader implications.
- Line 306-314, 339-349, 408-414: The manuscript uses a combination of trace-gas ratios, aerosol composition indicators, trajectory analysis, and HYSPLIT age estimates to distinguish fresh and aged pollution plumes. It would be helpful to provide a short summary explaining how these indicators were used to identify fresh versus aged air masses for each shuttle.
- Section 3.1: The multi-platform observational approach is a major strength of the study. The manuscript would benefit from a slightly stronger integration of the different datasets in the interpretation, with clearer statements on how airborne, ground-based, and lidar observations jointly support the conclusions.
- Section 3.3: This section provides important interpretation. Consider adding one or two sentences quantifying or summarising inferred mixing or recirculation timescales where possible. It may be a proper place to clarify how these conclusions relate to previous Po Valley studies.
- Section 3.4 discusses the presence of an elevated dust layer and its possible influence on atmospheric stability. This section is useful for providing context for the observed layering, but the connection to the main transport and mixing interpretation could be stated more explicitly. A brief clarification of how the dust layer may have influenced boundary-layer mixing, vertical exchange, or plume persistence during the analysed flights would help integrate this section more closely with the main conclusions of the paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6458-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6458/egusphere-2025-6458-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6458', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6458/egusphere-2025-6458-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2025-6458/egusphere-2025-6458-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, 19 May 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,126 | 627 | 116 | 1,869 | 635 | 96 | 231 |
- HTML: 1,126
- PDF: 627
- XML: 116
- Total: 1,869
- Supplement: 635
- BibTeX: 96
- EndNote: 231
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
General comments
This manuscript presents an observational analysis of pollution transport and vertical structure over the Po Valley using airborne measurements from the EMeRGe campaign, combined with ground-based observations, trajectory calculations, and dispersion modelling. The dataset is valuable, and the manuscript is clearly relevant for the special issue. The multi-platform observational approach provides important insight into vertical layering, recirculation, and plume variability in this complex region.
The manuscript is generally well structured and the results represent a useful contribution to the interpretation of EMeRGe observations and to the broader understanding of pollution transport over the Po Plain. However, the manuscript is some times highly descriptive and would benefit from some streamlining, with a clearer synthesis of its main scientific advances. I therefore recommend publication after minor revision.
Specific comments