Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6457
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6457
04 Jan 2026
 | 04 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Improved Comparability and System-Wide Verification to Support a Scalable Carbon Credit Market

Jean-Francois Lamarque, Pierre Friedlingstein, Brian Osias, Steve Strongin, Venkatramani Balaji, Kevin W. Bowman, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Heidi Cullen, Kenneth J. Davis, Scott C. Doney, Kevin R. Gurney, Alicia R. Karspeck, Charles D. Koven, Galen McKinley, Glen P. Peters, Julia Pongratz, Britt Stephens, and Colm Sweeney

Abstract. Achieving net-zero emissions over the coming decades requires unprecedented reductions in anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) complemented by a rapid ramp-up in the magnitude of global carbon dioxide removal (CDR). The carbon credit market (CCM) is emerging as a means to finance both emissions reductions and carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere. To achieve necessary growth on these fronts, the total scope and diversity of projects that are candidates for inclusion in the CCM must expand, necessitating a means of comprehensively assessing the quality of carbon credit projects (CCPs) based on their ability to make quantifiable reductions to GHG concentrations in the atmosphere. Toward a comprehensive quality assessment, we propose a framework to assess and differentiate CCPs based on their estimated impact on atmospheric GHG composition. In parallel, we propose a path towards verification of the aggregated atmospheric impact of CCM actions, since a detectable and attributable signal in atmospheric GHG composition can be viewed as the clearest measure of their climate forcing and, therefore, effectiveness.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jean-Francois Lamarque, Pierre Friedlingstein, Brian Osias, Steve Strongin, Venkatramani Balaji, Kevin W. Bowman, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Heidi Cullen, Kenneth J. Davis, Scott C. Doney, Kevin R. Gurney, Alicia R. Karspeck, Charles D. Koven, Galen McKinley, Glen P. Peters, Julia Pongratz, Britt Stephens, and Colm Sweeney

Status: open (until 15 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jean-Francois Lamarque, Pierre Friedlingstein, Brian Osias, Steve Strongin, Venkatramani Balaji, Kevin W. Bowman, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Heidi Cullen, Kenneth J. Davis, Scott C. Doney, Kevin R. Gurney, Alicia R. Karspeck, Charles D. Koven, Galen McKinley, Glen P. Peters, Julia Pongratz, Britt Stephens, and Colm Sweeney
Jean-Francois Lamarque, Pierre Friedlingstein, Brian Osias, Steve Strongin, Venkatramani Balaji, Kevin W. Bowman, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Heidi Cullen, Kenneth J. Davis, Scott C. Doney, Kevin R. Gurney, Alicia R. Karspeck, Charles D. Koven, Galen McKinley, Glen P. Peters, Julia Pongratz, Britt Stephens, and Colm Sweeney
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
This Perspective highlights requirements to scale the carbon credit market and enable the growth in climate solutions funded through such market.  The requirements are on the understanding of the value of the proposed carbon credit projects, and on the availability of a verification system.  This verification becomes particularly relevant as the carbon credit market scales to significant impacts on CO2 (or other greenhouse gases), such that attribution to collective actions can be identified.
Share