the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying Water Vapor Age: A Dynamical Constraint on the Response of the Global Water Cycle to Climate Change
Abstract. One important uncertainty of climate change is the rate of acceleration of the global water cycle. While the Clausius-Clapeyron equation predicts a 7 % rise in atmospheric moisture per degree of warming, climate models suggest globally averaged precipitation only changes by 1 % to 3 % (the hydrologic sensitivity). This discrepancy can be explained by a 4 % to 6 % increase in water vapor (WV) age per degree of warming. Typically, changes in precipitation are used to calculate changes in WV age by assuming a well-mixed atmosphere to calculate a global value, which obscures the effects of regional dynamics on changes to the WV age spectrum. In this work, we have developed novel passive tracers for calculating the WV age spectrum in an Eulerian model. By directly simulating the moments of the WV age spectrum, our method resolves the temporal and spatial variability of the WV age distribution, and allows us to calculate the age spectrum of the precipitating water as well. We have demonstrated our technique by implementing these tracers in the Isca modelling framework using a quasi-realistic configuration which we then perturbed with global sea surface temperature anomaly experiments. In our control experiment, the globally averaged mean WV age and mean age of precipitation was 7.06 and 7.33 days respectively, and compared well to previous estimates using Lagrangian models. With climate change, WV age generally increased in the troposphere and decreased in the stratosphere. Globally, the mean WV age increased by 4.93 % K-1 and the age of precipitation increased by 3.16 % K-1. With our temporal and spatial resolution of WV age, we also resolve the effects of the Hadley cell strengthening, as well as the poleward shift and intensification of the midlatitude eddies and storm tracks, demonstrating how the regional changes in WV age differed from the regional changes in precipitation age.
- Preprint
(21622 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6395', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Feb 2026
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Philippe Boulanger, 24 Jun 2026
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6395 - concern about model resolution', Heini Wernli, 20 Feb 2026
Dear Authors
Thanks for submitting the interesting results about your novel Eulerian approach to WCD. I have one concern after looking at the paper, which is related to the model simulations, in particular the resolution and number of simulated years. If I understand correctly, then your results are based on 5-year simulations with T42 spectral resolution. Such a resolution is very low and the simulations are short given the substantial interannual variability. With a T42 simulation you hardly capture atmospheric fronts, atmospheric rivers, tropical cyclones ... and orographic precipitation is strongly underestimated due to the smooth topography. I am very supportive of doing idealized and semi-realistic numerical studies, but then the limitations of such an approach should be kept in mind and made transparent to the readers. You mention in one sentence that you compared with T85, but this is still low resolution. Keep in mind that ERA5 reanalyses, which were used in some of the previous studies about water age, are based on IFS simulations with T639 spectral resolution. I do not assume that you can easily repeat your simulations with a much higher resolution, but I would like to invite you to make it much more transparent that your results are based on T42 simulations (in the abstract, in the conclusions, and maybe even in the title) and to discuss the limitations when it comes to the representation of essential precipitation systems across the globe. Also, if I am not mistaken Fig. 3 shows your 5-year climatology of E and P - these fields do not look very realistic to me, can you compare these fields critically with observation-based climatologies? In the abstract you provide very specific values for the mean WV age etc. and it is important that the reader understands that these values result from coarse resolution and short simulations.
With best regards,
Heini Wernli
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6395-CC1 - AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Philippe Boulanger, 24 Jun 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6395', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 May 2026
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Philippe Boulanger, 24 Jun 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,133 | 600 | 122 | 1,855 | 101 | 161 |
- HTML: 1,133
- PDF: 600
- XML: 122
- Total: 1,855
- BibTeX: 101
- EndNote: 161
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review of “Quantifying Water Vapor Age: A Dynamical Constraint on the Response of the Global Water Cycle to Climate Change” by Boulanger & Fajber
This manuscript introduces a well-formulated and computationally efficient Eulerian framework to diagnose the water vapor (WV) age spectrum by tracking moments of the WV age distribution. The authors make a clear and robust methodological contribution to the study of atmospheric moisture transport and its response to climate change.
The paper is generally well written and grounded in the existing literature on moisture recycling in the atmosphere. The results are physically interpretable and consistent with known circulation features in the atmsophere which makes the model results more interesting.
This manuscript can be considered for publication in Weather and Climate Dynamics after addressing the points listed below