Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6378
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6378
25 Feb 2026
 | 25 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Technical note: Quantifying System Limits: Flood Oriented Operational Stress Testing under Intensified Precipitation Regimes in Central Europe

Jens Reinert, Elena-Maria Klopries, Paul Hassenjürgen, Alexander Menz, Julian Hofmann, Catrina Brüll, Angela Klein, and Holger Schüttrumpf

Abstract. The rise of short-duration extreme rainfall events across Central Europe has exposed critical weaknesses in traditional flood risk management methods that depend on fixed return periods and design thresholds. In response, this paper introduces FLOOD-ST: a scenario-based operational stress testing framework designed to evaluate the functional limits and vulnerabilities of water infrastructure systems under realistic, high-impact flood scenarios.

FLOOD-ST combines synthetic rainfall archetypes, varying antecedent soil moisture conditions and infrastructure-specific scenarios to systematically evaluate system performance. By integrating elements of functional stress testing, the framework diagnoses weak points and illuminates cascading failure pathways across interconnected assets. Unlike traditional hazard mapping, FLOOD-ST does not aim to replace existing tools but complements them by offering a diagnostic view of system behaviour during extreme conditions. The framework is platform-independent, modular, and scalable, making it suitable for both urban and rural catchments, especially those characterised by high system complexity, short warning times, or critical interdependencies.

This paper describes the conceptual foundation, simulation workflow, and real-world applications of FLOOD-ST, demonstrating its potential to support adaptive planning, emergency preparedness, and climate-resilient water management.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jens Reinert, Elena-Maria Klopries, Paul Hassenjürgen, Alexander Menz, Julian Hofmann, Catrina Brüll, Angela Klein, and Holger Schüttrumpf

Status: open (until 08 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jens Reinert, Elena-Maria Klopries, Paul Hassenjürgen, Alexander Menz, Julian Hofmann, Catrina Brüll, Angela Klein, and Holger Schüttrumpf
Jens Reinert, Elena-Maria Klopries, Paul Hassenjürgen, Alexander Menz, Julian Hofmann, Catrina Brüll, Angela Klein, and Holger Schüttrumpf
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 25 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Flood risk in increasing as intense rainfall events become more frequent and water management systems are stressed beyond their original design. This study develops a new way to examine how rivers, flood protection measures and emergency operations behave during realistic but severe flood situations. Instead of focusing on single design events, we tested a range of plausible rainfall patterns, ground wetness conditions and infrastructure disruptions.
Share