Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6355
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6355
13 Jan 2026
 | 13 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Surface Kinetic Energy Distributions in the North and Equatorial Atlantic Derived from Surface Drifter Observations and High-Resolution Numerical Models with Tidal Forcing

Rémi Laxenaire, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Alan J. Wallcraft, Luna Hiron, Brian K. Arbic, Maarten C. Buijsman, Miguel Solano, and Shane Elipot

Abstract. Surface kinetic energy (KE) reflects the distribution of ocean circulation across temporal and spatial scales, shaping energy transfer and mixing in the upper ocean. Quantifying both total KE and its frequency content helps characterize processes from low-frequency motions to tides and near-inertial waves, but KE variability is difficult to quantify with observations alone. High-resolution tidal-resolving ocean models can bridge gaps in our understanding, yet the modeling results depend on the realism of the configuration choices. Focusing on the North and Equatorial Atlantic, we compare surface drifter observations to seven HYCOM high-resolution simulations. We assess model parameters that influence KE across the frequency bands. We first quantify the impact of a Lagrangian versus Eulerian framework in interpreting the KE variability and then perform a series of experiments to quantify the sensitivity of the KE distribution to parameter choices. These experiments show that horizontal resolution is the dominant control for the offshore KE, strongly increasing total and semidiurnal KE, while vertical refinement has a smaller impact offshore, and a stronger impact on the shelf. High-frequency wind forcing amplifies the diurnal and near-inertial variability, while finer bathymetry increases the semidiurnal energy. In contrast, adding wave drag reduces the offshore energy only below the critical latitudes. Overall, the in-depth quantification of the sensitivity of the modeled total KE and its spectral distribution to the parameters offers guidance for setting up high-resolution tide-resolving model experiments.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Rémi Laxenaire, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Alan J. Wallcraft, Luna Hiron, Brian K. Arbic, Maarten C. Buijsman, Miguel Solano, and Shane Elipot

Status: open (until 10 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Rémi Laxenaire, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Alan J. Wallcraft, Luna Hiron, Brian K. Arbic, Maarten C. Buijsman, Miguel Solano, and Shane Elipot
Rémi Laxenaire, Eric P. Chassignet, Xiaobiao Xu, Alan J. Wallcraft, Luna Hiron, Brian K. Arbic, Maarten C. Buijsman, Miguel Solano, and Shane Elipot
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 13 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Fast-changing currents shape surface energy and drive interior mixing of heat and salt. Because they are hard to observe globally, we use numerical models to quantify their impacts. We evaluate seven North and Equatorial Atlantic simulations with varying parameterizations, comparing modeled currents with those from observed surface buoy tracks. We show results are sensitive to model grid and seafloor resolution, tides and wind variability, with contrasting offshore and nearshore responses.
Share