the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Blue-green infrastructure for climate adaptation: a socio-economic assessment of decentralised rain-water management measures in the urban environment
Abstract. This study assesses decentralised blue-green infrastructure measures for urban climate adaptation in Berlin and Cologne using a dual approach that combines multi-criteria analysis and cost–benefit analysis. Twenty sustainable urban drainage system variants, including swales, trenches, tree pits, green roofs, and cisterns, are evaluated with respect to economic, social, environmental, and hydrological performance. Results show that vegetated measures, particularly swales and tree-based systems, achieve the highest overall scores and positive net-benefit values, while predominantly underground systems perform less well. The integrated assessment highlights important co-benefits and trade-offs of blue-green infrastructure and provides decision support for prioritising nature-based solutions in urban rainwater management.
- Preprint
(824 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6344', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Feb 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Flora Dicke, 24 Feb 2026
Many thanks for the detailed and helpful review, we will include more specific details in the description of the methodology and study area description respectively.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6344-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Flora Dicke, 24 Feb 2026
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-6344', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Feb 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | 71 | 24 | 325 | 22 | 35 |
- HTML: 230
- PDF: 71
- XML: 24
- Total: 325
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 35
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The paper assessed an important topic of Blue-green infrastructure for climate adaptation with two case studies and using two methodologies.
The study provides some valuable results, but the methodology and study areas should be better introduced and explained. In this way, the understanding of the results and the transferability of the methodology would be improved.
All my comments are attached in the file.