Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6327
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6327
19 Jan 2026
 | 19 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Wind and turbulence evaluation of the ICON model (icon-2024.01-1) at sub-kilometer scales using Doppler lidar observations

Maike Ahlgrimm and Eileen Päschke

Abstract. Regional numerical weather prediction models are increasingly run at sub-kilometer scale horizontal resolutions, where turbulence can no longer be considered as an entirely sub-grid scale process (the ”turbulent gray zone”). Existing turbulence evaluation methods often rely on high-resolution benchmark simulations. We present an alternative evaluation method based on Doppler lidar retrievals of winds and turbulent properties in the atmospheric boundary layer.

Two configurations of the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model are compared for horizontal mesh sizes ranging from 2.1 km to 78 m: the operationally used 1D TKE scheme "Turbdiff" which includes scale-adaptive features and accounts for some 3D turbulent terms, and a 3D Smagorinsky scheme, commonly used in large eddy simulations. Winds, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), eddy diffusivity rate (EDR) and turbulent length scale from the Doppler lidar retrieval are used in the evaluation. Diagnostics for an equitable comparison of observed and simulated TKE are applied, accounting for grid-scale and sub-grid scale model contributions.

Results show that winds remain very similar across all resolutions and between configurations, while pronounced differences are found in TKE and EDR. The 3D Smagorinsky configuration performs poorly at coarse resolutions, overestimating both TKE and EDR, but shows comparable performance to Turbdiff at 78 m. Turbdiff more successfully re-partitions TKE between grid-scale and subgrid-scale contributions, roughly preserving the total TKE across mesh sizes. Both configurations show systematic errors in the stable nocturnal boundary layer, coinciding with poor representations of the turbulent length scale.

This study demonstrates the value of the Doppler lidar retrieval as an evaluation tool, shows that the scale-adaptive Turbdiff scheme suffers no loss of performance into the turbulent gray zone and highlights specific aspects of the scheme that limit performance for stable night-time conditions. We illustrate the relevance of the demonstrated model performance for two applications: the estimation of mixing layer height from EDR for dispersion modeling, and turbulence intensity derived from TKE for applications in the wind energy sector.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Maike Ahlgrimm and Eileen Päschke

Status: open (until 16 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Maike Ahlgrimm and Eileen Päschke
Maike Ahlgrimm and Eileen Päschke

Viewed

Total article views: 135 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
79 50 6 135 6 6
  • HTML: 79
  • PDF: 50
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 135
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 102 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 102 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
This study uses a new type of observation of wind and turbulence to investigate the accuracy with which the German weather forecasting model predicts these variables in the lowest 600 metres of the atmosphere. The model performs adequately during the day, but struggles with both wind and turbulence at night. This is important for wind energy planning and understanding how airborne particles are transported by the wind. The study suggests ways in which the model could be further improved.
Share