Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6128
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6128
02 Jan 2026
 | 02 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).

Citizen science as a long-term environmental baseline: assessing impacts of a small dam removal in Montana, USA

Bethany Blakey and Natalie Bursztyn

Abstract. As dam removals increase in frequency across the U.S., most research has focused on the impact of larger dam removals, despite the removal of small dams being much more common. There are hundreds of small dams in Montana, and this research investigates impact on stream ecology and morphology using citizen science data collected over eight years spanning before and after a 2020 small dam removal in Rattlesnake Creek. We analyzed pebble count grain size distributions and aquatic macroinvertebrate biotic indices from 2017 to 2024 to assess changes in sediment transport and macroinvertebrate population as well as evaluate the efficacy of citizen science for long-term stream monitoring. Our analysis includes comparisons of pre– and post–dam removal data collected from above and below the dam site. Our findings revealed no significant changes in grain size or macroinvertebrate index values between upstream and downstream reaches post–dam removal, suggesting that the removal of this small dam had minimal detectable impact on sediment transport and macroinvertebrate communities within the study period. Our study also demonstrates the capacity for citizen science programs to effectively collect robust and valuable datasets. This study underscores the importance of meticulous data management along with the potential for, and challenges of, citizen science for environmental research. We provide recommendations for "best practices" to improve future citizen science monitoring and informing decision-making for future dam removals, particularly for the nine dams further upstream within the Rattlesnake Creek watershed.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Bethany Blakey and Natalie Bursztyn

Status: open (until 27 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Bethany Blakey and Natalie Bursztyn
Bethany Blakey and Natalie Bursztyn

Viewed

Total article views: 136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
92 35 9 136 7 8
  • HTML: 92
  • PDF: 35
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 136
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 136 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
We analyzed eight years of citizen science data from a creek in Montana, USA to understand the impacts of small dam removal and explore the quality of citizen scientist stream monitoring. Volunteers measured sediments and counted aquatic insects at sites above and below the dam before and after its removal. We found the citizen scientists collected high-quality data that showed no change in stream health following dam removal. We highlight key practices for successful citizen science monitoring.
Share