the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modelling debris-covered glacier dynamics: transient response to changes and feedbacks in debris and climate forcing
Abstract. Glaciers worldwide are becoming increasingly debris-covered, yet many parts within the coupled glacier-debris system are not well-understood. While the insulating effect of debris is well-known, observations of debris cover are scarce, often limited by logistical challenges. The main aim of the study is to better understand the complex transient glacier response and debris-induced feedbacks through numerical flow modelling. We present a newly developed 1-dimensional flowline model that couples ice flow, depth-resolved debris transport, and debris cover impact on mass balance. This approach allows for a detailed examination of the dynamics of debris-covered glaciers under transient forcing conditions of climate and debris input over extended timescales. Our results indicate that low-amplitude, decade-scale variability in debris or climate forcing does not significantly impact glacier evolution. However, large debris supply events can have a sustained impact. We find that debris-covered glacier response to warming climate forcing is non-monotonic, with distinct phases of thinning, retreat, and long-term re-advance. We attribute this to a separate, longer timescale process of englacial debris transportation. Additionally, feedbacks in the englacial debris trajectory and complex bed topography further increase the non-linearity of transient glacier response.
- Preprint
(3589 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5997', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Mar 2026
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Florian Hardmeier, 04 Jun 2026
We thank the anonymous referee for this extensive review that engages deeply with our manuscript and provides constructive, detailed comments for improvements.
In the attached PDF, we respond to and propose changes according to the referee’s comments.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Florian Hardmeier, 04 Jun 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5997', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Apr 2026
This is a useful and well-written paper. The model and experiments are highly idealized, limiting the possibility of comparison with observations but making the responses explainable. Although it deals with more sophisticated representations of ablation, https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/20/1895/2026/ might be a useful reference on model limitations. Otherwise, my comments are limited to editorial suggestions.
Minor corrections:3
“The main aim of this study”35
“transported on the surface”41
“As debris is transported either”69
“cannot be considered”100
“magnitudes which”211
“we ensure that the Courant-Friedrich-Levy (CFL) condition is satisfied”233
“debris mass conservation”235
“discussion of the main model experiments”252
“debris start to emerge do the two surfaces”285
“which is the latter subtracted from the former”325
“to be only 18% slower”356
unbalanced parentheses389
“Note that the debris input area”403
“are almost completely halted”441
“leads to melt-out” – delete “that”588
misplaced (Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5997-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Florian Hardmeier, 04 Jun 2026
We thank the referee for their positive comments and suggestions for improvement. Below, we respond to and propose changes according to the referee’s comments. The editorial suggestions, especially in the introduction and methods, may become redundant due to more fundamental revisions based on other referee comments.
We will add references to the recently published DCG-MIP paper wherever appropriate, certainly in the limitations section (e.g., L618-621), maybe also in the introduction.
Â
Minor corrections
L3: "The main aim of this study”
Will be done.
L35: “transported on the surface”
Will be done.
L41: “As debris is transported either”
Will be done.
L69: "cannot be considered”
Will be done.
L100: "magnitudes which”
Will be done.
L211: “we ensure that the Courant-Friedrich-Levy (CFL) condition is satisfied”
Will be done.
L233: “debris mass conservation”
Will be done.
L235: “discussion of the main model experiments”
Will be done.
L252: “debris start to emerge do the two surfaces”
Will be done.
L285: “which is the latter subtracted from the former”
Will be done.
L325: “to be only 18% slower”
Will be done.
L356: unbalanced parentheses
Will be corrected.
L389: "Note that the debris input area”
Will be done.
L403: “are almost completely halted”
Will be done.
L441: “leads to melt-out” – delete “that”
Will be done.
L588: misplaced (
Will be done.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5997-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Florian Hardmeier, 04 Jun 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,094 | 767 | 103 | 1,964 | 81 | 108 |
- HTML: 1,094
- PDF: 767
- XML: 103
- Total: 1,964
- BibTeX: 81
- EndNote: 108
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
See attachment.