the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Improving multi-modal wind speed prediction of short and medium term with a bi-clustered machine learning method
Abstract. Accurate prediction of wind speed is of great importance for stable and reliable operation of wind farms. However, the single numerical model forecast cannot provide precise wind speed outputs due to the defect of its physical parameterization scheme, whose error will gradually grow with increasing prediction time. Therefore, we proposed a model named Bi-clustered Recursive Bayesian Forest (BCRBR) for wind speed prediction and correction. The approach incorporated Sea-land Breeze and weather stability effects, integrating an atmospheric circulation index as input features; wind farm data underwent modal classification via bi-clustering to mitigate wind speed magnitude interactions, followed by machine learning-based correction of wind speed. The method was proved to be effective for wind speed prediction correction. Compared to forecasts from the Weather Research and Forecasting model, wind speed error indicators were reduced by more than 60 %; and the forecast precision increased from 30.2 % to 78.4 %, of which the improvement is more than twice. Compared to other models, the proposed model presented favorable correction results in different types of wind field, indicating its greater versatility and stronger competitiveness than other models.
- Preprint
(2244 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 18 May 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5370', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 May 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 132 | 47 | 13 | 192 | 11 | 14 |
- HTML: 132
- PDF: 47
- XML: 13
- Total: 192
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 14
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1. There are many speed forecasting method available in literatures? How this method is specifically different from other works in terms of performance in prediction? Whether the authors did any comparison with existing works available in literatures? This shall be included in the results section.
2. How the historical data from April to July 2023 is alone sufficient to predict data for August 2023? Whether this work considers any uncertainties?
3. Is there any other data considered such as moisture, or air density for wind speed prediction?
4. In Figure 6, which characterizes the results of the BCMMC model, the colors used to distinguish the individual clusters may not be easily distinguishable. It is recommended to use an alternative color scheme for better recognition.
5. Why don't the authors try normalized data for training instead of actual data?
6. Although the paper summarizes the advantages and potential applications of the BCRBR model in the conclusion section, the discussion section lacks an in-depth exploration of the model's potential limitations and directions for future improvements. It is recommended that the authors further discuss the model's limitations in the discussion section, such as its dependence on specific wind field conditions and computational resource requirements, and propose possible directions for future research improvements.