the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Gas Migration and Slope Instability in the Danube Fan: Insights from integrated OBS-MCS Seismic Analysis
Abstract. Gas hydrates and deltaic deep-sea fans are main features in continental margin systems, influencing slope stability, fluid migration, and carbon cycling. In the northwestern Black Sea, the Danube Fan remains poorly constrained with respect to subsurface structure, sediment strength, and hydrate dynamics. Here, we present high-resolution multichannel seismic (MCS) and ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) data to characterise sedimentary structure and fluid-related features. Two integrated OBS–MCS profiles reveal underconsolidated, clay-rich levee deposits interspersed with mass-transport units, chaotic facies, and gas-related anomalies. Derived P- and S-wave velocity models indicate low shear strength and high Vp/Vs-ratios in shallow units, consistent with soft, water-saturated sediments. Deeper layers display compaction-driven velocity increases but remain mechanically weak, rendering the slope prone to failure. Our findings suggest that vertical gas migration is widespread, expressed by seismic chimneys, polarity reversals, and velocity pull-downs, with free gas confined below bottom simulating reflectors and in stratigraphic traps. Hydrates likely occur as sparse, patchy pore-filling accumulations, and the lack of S-wave velocity anomalies suggests they do not act as cementing phases, implying little direct influence on sediment strength or slope stability. The hydrate system appears hydrate-poor, possibly reflecting post-glacial re-equilibration. Overall, lithology, gas migration pathways, and high sedimentation rates emerge as primary controls on hydrate formation and slope instability in the Danube Fan.
- Preprint
(2765 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(946 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 28 Mar 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5275', Leon Thomsen, 09 Feb 2026 reply
Data sets
2D multichannel seismic profiles during Maria S. Merian cruise MSM34, Black Sea J. Bialas and M. Riedel https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921576
3D P-cable seismic data during Maria S. Merian cruise MSM34, Black Sea J. Bialas et al. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921631
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 103 | 29 | 14 | 146 | 20 | 15 | 19 |
- HTML: 103
- PDF: 29
- XML: 14
- Total: 146
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This is a useful study, and should be published, subject addressing of the following technica l issues:
*Line 121. The vector rotation implied here seems to be innocuous, a simple mathematical operation. But it assumes that the rotated data is a vector. While the incoming wave is certainly a vector, the data as recorded may not be, since the various recorded components may have different instrumental responses. This is called the issue of vector infidelity. Each recorded component is certainly unfaithful (an input impulse does result in a recorded impulse), but this does not lead to vector infidelity, if each component is unfaithful in the same way. The ms does not show data or discussion to give the reader confidence on this issue.
Separately, the ms does not indicate which part of the data provide the basis for the rotation. Is it the direct arrival through the water?
*Fig. 3bd. The figure shows the polarity reversing at normal incidence, as the source passes the instrument; this is as it should be. But the data should (according to simple theory) go smoothly to zero during this transit; instead the data show strong horizontally-polarized arrivals at normal incidence. This behavior has been noted previously, and deserves a substantive discussion here.
*Fig.4. The caption here refers to a velocity decrease, which is not shown in Fig. 6. Please discuss.
*Fig. 5. The so-called BSR's do not simulate the bottom very accurately. Please discuss.
Also, minor issues are noted in the attached ms.