Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5256
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5256
08 Jan 2026
 | 08 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

The Path to FAIR Research Models: Lessons Learned

Albert J. Kettner, Leslie Hsu, and Brandon S. Serna

Abstract. Numerical modeling of Earth surface processes emerged as an important scientific tool in the late 1960s to mid-1970s, driven by the development of finite element methods in computer science. These advancements, initially applied in civil engineering, enabled scientists to simulate complex geological phenomena. At that time, models were often only described in publications, access was limited to researchers with direct connections to the developers, and the code was rarely documented for reuse, limiting their application beyond the original research context. The FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) as applied to data began to take shape in the 21st century with the rise of open science, digital repositories, and standardized data sharing frameworks. In the late 2010s, grassroots movements began to apply some of the FAIRness goals to numerical models. Subsequently, more formalized FAIR model principles were developed that addressed the specific needs of the scientific modeling community, resulting in the formulation of the FAIR principles for research software (FAIR4RS).

In this study, we examine the development and implementation of strategies by two geoscience research infrastructures – the CSDMS (Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System) Model Repository and the U.S. Geological Survey Model Catalog – to enhance the FAIRness of models guided by FAIR4RS. Some of the development and implementation efforts described predate the formalization of FAIR and FAIR4RS principles, making this an ongoing and adaptive process. We evaluate the temporal progression towards increased FAIR4RS alignment across three phases of research infrastructure development: prototype, refinement, and growth & iteration. Although certain principles were more straightforward to implement early in prototypes of the catalog infrastructures, others required broader community collaboration during refinement, and some continue to pose practical challenges in the growth and iteration phase. By tracing these dynamics, our aim is to provide insights that can guide other modeling initiatives in effectively adopting FAIR4RS principles within their communities.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Albert J. Kettner, Leslie Hsu, and Brandon S. Serna

Status: open (until 05 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Albert J. Kettner, Leslie Hsu, and Brandon S. Serna
Albert J. Kettner, Leslie Hsu, and Brandon S. Serna
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 08 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
This paper reviews how two major geoscience communities, the Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System (CSDMS) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), are making scientific models more FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. By comparing their approaches and lessons learned, it highlights practical steps that improve openness, collaboration, and transparency in Earth system modeling.
Share