the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Constraining landslide frequency across the United States to inform county-level risk reduction
Abstract. Informative landslide hazard estimates are needed to support landslide mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risk across the United States. Whereas existing national-scale landslide susceptibility products assess where landslides are likely to occur, they do not address how often, which is a critical element of landslide hazard and risk assessments. In particular, the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Risk Index (NRI) requires landslide frequency estimates to inform expected annual loss estimates. In this study, we present county-level landslide frequency (landslides area-1 y-1) estimates for the 50 U.S. states. We applied Bayesian negative binomial regression to estimate both the expected (average) reported landslide frequency and full distribution of annual landslide counts for each county. We compared a suite of models that used combinations of landslide susceptible area, probability of potentially triggering earthquakes, frequency of potentially triggering precipitation, and ecological region as predictors. We trained our models with landslide inventory data from counties with the most comprehensive records available nationwide and used zero-inflated negative binomial distributions as an incompleteness model to correct for temporal reporting gaps. We selected a preferred model based on information criteria and physically plausible parameter estimates. Our preferred model showed that average annual reported landslide frequencies vary by five orders of magnitude across U.S. counties, ranging from 0.002 (0.00015–0.05) landslides 1000 km-2y-1 in Kusilvak Census Area, Alaska to 29 (19–46) landslides 1000 km-2 y-1 in Lake County, California, reflecting the country’s strong variations in landslide susceptibility, earthquake probability, and other factors for which ecological region serves as a proxy. Counties with estimated frequencies in the top 20 % of all counties are predominately along the West Coast of the continental United States, in mountainous regions of the Pacific Northwest and Intermountain West, in locally steep or earthquake prone regions of the Midwest and Southeast, along the Appalachians, in southern Alaska, and on some Hawaiian Islands. By examining the number of landslides predicted in 99th percentile years for each county, we identified that 26 % of U.S. counties likely have potential for widespread landsliding with more than 10 landslides 1000 km-2 y-1, even when such large events have not been reported in the training data for that county. Overall, our results better represent the range of possible landslide frequencies and spatial variations than previous national-scale estimates reported in the NRI and can inform other risk reduction and loss mitigation efforts across the United States.
- Preprint
(8186 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-947', Maria Teresa Brunetti, 14 May 2025
General comments
The work aims to estimate the frequency of landslides in the US using available landslide inventories. Landslides are those triggered by earthquakes and precipitation.
The manuscript overall is well written and the objectives of the work are clear. The approach is also promising. Nevertheless, the part describing the models and techniques used (section 2.4) is somewhat cryptic and not easy to read for those with non-advanced skills on statistical distributions, such as negative binomial, applied to overdispersed data. I strongly suggest expanding the part on the models used, giving a more accessible explanation related to the purpose of the work.
Figures (especially 1, 2 and 6) are too dense of information and not easily readable. As a consequence, figure captions are also too long. Please consider moving some figures to a Supplementary Material section.
In addition, as a general rule, figures must be cited in advance in the text. For multiple maps/graphs in the same figure, they must also be cited in the text in the order given.
Specific comments
See attached PDF.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lisa Luna, 02 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-947', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jun 2025
The study addresses a significant gap in current national-scale landslide susceptibility research by prioritizing the frequency of landslides, which is essential for effective hazard and risk management planning. The manuscript is well-structured and states its objectives clearly, emphasizing the importance of informative landslide hazard estimates for mitigation planning and risk reduction at a national level. The authors employ Bayesian negative binomial regression to model landslide frequencies at the county level using predictor variables that comprise susceptible area, earthquake potential, precipitation frequency, and ecological region. Authors highlight the extreme diversity of landslide susceptibility across the United States, with frequencies described as ranging from a few incidents in some areas to high concentrations in others. There are some minor issues to be modified in the manuscript before publication. The methodology should be presented more concisely and provide the reader with an explanation for further advancing the proposed methods. The proposed manuscript is a significant addition to landslide hazard assessment in that it provides more complete and spatially resolved frequency data than have been feasible with national-scale studies. It is a publication standard, providing valuable information that can be utilized to direct targeted risk reduction and mitigation efforts across the United States.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-947-RC2 - AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Lisa Luna, 02 Jun 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-947', Maria Teresa Brunetti, 14 May 2025
General comments
The work aims to estimate the frequency of landslides in the US using available landslide inventories. Landslides are those triggered by earthquakes and precipitation.
The manuscript overall is well written and the objectives of the work are clear. The approach is also promising. Nevertheless, the part describing the models and techniques used (section 2.4) is somewhat cryptic and not easy to read for those with non-advanced skills on statistical distributions, such as negative binomial, applied to overdispersed data. I strongly suggest expanding the part on the models used, giving a more accessible explanation related to the purpose of the work.
Figures (especially 1, 2 and 6) are too dense of information and not easily readable. As a consequence, figure captions are also too long. Please consider moving some figures to a Supplementary Material section.
In addition, as a general rule, figures must be cited in advance in the text. For multiple maps/graphs in the same figure, they must also be cited in the text in the order given.
Specific comments
See attached PDF.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Lisa Luna, 02 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-947', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jun 2025
The study addresses a significant gap in current national-scale landslide susceptibility research by prioritizing the frequency of landslides, which is essential for effective hazard and risk management planning. The manuscript is well-structured and states its objectives clearly, emphasizing the importance of informative landslide hazard estimates for mitigation planning and risk reduction at a national level. The authors employ Bayesian negative binomial regression to model landslide frequencies at the county level using predictor variables that comprise susceptible area, earthquake potential, precipitation frequency, and ecological region. Authors highlight the extreme diversity of landslide susceptibility across the United States, with frequencies described as ranging from a few incidents in some areas to high concentrations in others. There are some minor issues to be modified in the manuscript before publication. The methodology should be presented more concisely and provide the reader with an explanation for further advancing the proposed methods. The proposed manuscript is a significant addition to landslide hazard assessment in that it provides more complete and spatially resolved frequency data than have been feasible with national-scale studies. It is a publication standard, providing valuable information that can be utilized to direct targeted risk reduction and mitigation efforts across the United States.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-947-RC2 - AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Lisa Luna, 02 Jun 2025
Model code and software
Bayesian county-level landslide frequency estimation for the 50 U.S. States Lisa Luna and Jacob Woodard https://code.usgs.gov/ghsc/lhp/reference/bayesian-county-landslide-frequency
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
399 | 130 | 20 | 549 | 14 | 31 |
- HTML: 399
- PDF: 130
- XML: 20
- Total: 549
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 31
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1