Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-886
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-886
09 May 2025
 | 09 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Anatomy of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice lows in an ocean–sea ice model

Benjamin Richaud, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Dániel Topál, Antoine Barthélemy, and David Docquier

Abstract. Sea ice has exhibited a number of record lows in both hemispheres over the past two decades. While the causes of individual sea ice lows have already been investigated extensively, no systematic comparison across events and hemispheres has been conducted in a consistent framework yet. Here, the global standalone ocean--sea ice model NEMO4.2-SI3 at 1/4° resolution is used to decompose the sea ice mass budget. We separate the relative contributions of sea ice melt versus growth and thermodynamic versus dynamic processes, both from a climatological perspective and for selected individual years. The seasonal cycles of Arctic and Antarctic ice mass fluxes show similarities, such as the prevalence of basal growth and melt in the mass budget. The long-term evolution of the mass budget terms reveals an increased importance of basal melt in both hemispheres, at the expense of surface and lateral melt. Regarding sea ice lows, the model indicates that the Arctic 2007 anomaly was chiefly caused by dynamic factors, while the Arctic 2012 event was rather explained by thermodynamic factors. The Antarctic 2022 event was partly driven by a strong interplay between dynamic and thermodynamic processes. Regarding the Antarctic winter 2023 event, it was characterized by a notable lack of basal growth. This study emphasizes the dominance of processes at the ice-ocean interface in driving the ice mass evolution at all time scales considered here, and highlights the potential of the ice mass budget decomposition to further our understanding of the evolution of polar regions in a changing climate.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Benjamin Richaud, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Dániel Topál, Antoine Barthélemy, and David Docquier

Status: open (until 20 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Benjamin Richaud, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Dániel Topál, Antoine Barthélemy, and David Docquier
Benjamin Richaud, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Dániel Topál, Antoine Barthélemy, and David Docquier

Viewed

Total article views: 85 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
68 14 3 85 7 2 2
  • HTML: 68
  • PDF: 14
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 85
  • Supplement: 7
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 80 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 80 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Sea ice covers in the Arctic and Antarctic experienced intense reduction during specific recent years. Using an ocean-sea ice model, we found similarities between hemispheres and years to explain the ice reduction, such as ice melt (or lack of growth) at the ice-ocean interface. Differences between years and regions are also evident, such as increased ice transport or snow precipitation. This highlights the importance of heat stored by the ocean to explain ice melt in a warming climate.
Share