the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Component Summation Technique for Measuring Upwelling Longwave Irradiance in the Presence of an Obstruction
Abstract. The CERES Ocean Validation Experiment (COVE) was an instrument suite located at the Chesapeake Light Station approximately 25 kilometers east of Virginia Beach, Virginia (36.9° N, 75.7° W). COVE provided surface verification for the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite measurements for 16 years. However, the large light station occupied approximately 15 % of the field of view of the upwelling longwave flux measurement (LW↑), so radiation from the structure artificially perturbed the measurements. Hence, we use data from multiple instruments that are not influenced by the structure to accurately obtain LW↑; we call this the longwave component summation technique. The instruments required for the component summation are an infrared radiation thermometer to measure sea surface temperature, a pyrgeometer to measure downwelling longwave irradiance, and an air temperature probe. We find a strong negative bias between the obstructed upwelling pyrgeometer measurements and the component summation LW↑ in the colder months, less so in the warmer months. The bias ranged from -6 % to +5 % over COVE from 2004–2013. These range of biases are larger than the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) targeted uncertainties of 2 % or 3 W-m−2 (whichever is greatest), indicating that the component summation technique provides a significant correction to standard BSRN protocols when an obstruction is present. This work documents how we determine the component summation LW↑ irradiances and presents guidelines for how this method could be used at other locations.
- Preprint
(3841 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 13 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-872', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Apr 2025
reply
Overall, the paper discusses a highly important alternative to determining longwave irradiance if an obstruction is present. This change will help improve data collection at environmental monitoring stations, both current and that may be in use in the future. I recommend this article for publication, following some minor revisions outlined below.
Line 28: Please remove the acronym definition of NASA from Line 32 to Line 28. This is the first place it is mentioned.
Equation 2: Is this a derived equation? Or created by the authors as a model for collected data? A reader would benefit from having some background on the established relationships and source of all equations, not just Equation 2.
Line 260—262, related to Figures 6 and 7: is the expectation that the LWcs is to be pretty consistent and not impacted by air temperatures? Mentioning that the adjusted data matches expectations (and why) could help emphasize the validity of the new measurement technique.
Line 280: How is FOV found/calculated? This explanation may help readers trying to apply this to their own situation.
Figure 8: The x-axis should have a lower-case F to match the variable in Equation 11.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-872-RC1 -
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Bryan E Fabbri, 21 Apr 2025
reply
Hello, thank you for taking the time to review this paper, recommending the article for publication and for your suggestions. To respond to your suggestions:
- I will make the subtle change moving the NASA acronym from Line 32 to 28 and make the change to the Fig. 8 plot (having a lower case f to be consistent with Eq. 11).
- Eq. 2 is a hybrid. That is, the equation was taken from an existing equation for deriving upwelling LW radiation and then other variables were added to account for the emissivity of air and the air temperature. The existing equation part should have been included in the paper and the source in the bibliography, and this will be added. I will also review the other equations and determine any background information that may need to be added.
- Yes. The expectation for Fig. 6 and 7 (Line 260-262) is that LWcs is pretty consistent and not impacted by air temperature. New words can be added to emphasize this point.
- FOV (line 280) was initially determined using a grid system and later refined (or confirmed) using a software package called "ImageJ" to separate the water from the structure obstruction. This can be added to the bibliography and to the body of the article.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-872-CC1
-
CC1: 'Reply on RC1', Bryan E Fabbri, 21 Apr 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 | 11 | 3 | 80 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 66
- PDF: 11
- XML: 3
- Total: 80
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 42 | 41 |
China | 2 | 14 | 13 |
undefined | 3 | 10 | 9 |
Germany | 4 | 5 | 4 |
France | 5 | 4 | 3 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 42