the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
ISEFlow v1.0: A Flow-Based Neural Network Emulator for Improved Sea Level Projections and Uncertainty Quantification
Abstract. Ice sheets are the primary contributors to global sea level rise, yet projecting their future contributions remains challenging due to the complex, nonlinear processes governing their dynamics and uncertainties in future climate scenarios. This study introduces ISEFlow (v1.0), a neural network-based emulator of the ISMIP6 ice sheet model ensemble designed to accurately and efficiently predict sea level contributions from both ice sheets while quantifying the sources of projection uncertainty. By integrating a normalizing flow architecture to capture data coverage uncertainty and a deep ensemble of LSTM models to assess emulator uncertainty, ISEFlow separates uncertainties arising from training data from those inherent to the emulator. Compared to existing emulators such as Emulandice and LARMIP, ISEFlow achieves substantially lower mean squared error and improved distribution approximation while maintaining faster inference times. This study investigates the drivers of increased accuracy and emission scenario distinction and finds that the inclusion of all available climate forcings, ice sheet model characteristics, and higher spatial resolution significantly enhances predictive accuracy and the ability to capture the effects of varying emissions scenarios compared to other emulators. We include a detailed analysis of importance of input variables using Shapley Additive Explanations, and highlight both the climate forcings and model characteristics that have the largest impact on sea level projections. ISEFlow offers a computationally efficient tool for generating accurate sea level projections, supporting climate risk assessments and informing policy decisions.
- Preprint
(3874 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 28 May 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-870', Anders Levermann, 26 Mar 2025
reply
Dear authors,
This is a very interesting approach. There is another emulator for both Greenland and Antarctica that might be worthwhile comparing the results too, because it is a very transparent extrapolation of the observed sea level contribution into the future:
Future sea-level rise constrained by observations and long-term commitment
M. Mengel•, A. Levermann, K. Frieler, A. Robinson, B. Marzeion, R. Winkelmann
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 113 (2016), 2597-2602, doi:10.1073/pnas.1500515113.This is not necessary for the paper, but perhaps interesting.
Cheers
Anders
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870-CC1 -
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-870', Juan Antonio Añel, 08 Apr 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlYou have archived the data that you use to produce your manuscript in a website that does not comply with our requirements as suitable repository. Therefore, you must store the data necessary to replicate your work (input data for training the model and outputs) in one of the acceptable repositories according to our policy, and reply to this comment with its link and permanent identifier (e.g. DOI). Please, do it as soon as possible, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy.
Also, in any potentially reviewed version of your manuscript, you must include the mentioned information in the "Code and Data Availability" section.
I would like to note that the "Code and Data Availability" section is not designed to host information to publicize the last version of a model, webage, etc. but to assure the replicability of the published work. Therefore, I would ask you to remove all the information that you have in such section that does not correspond to the exact permanent repositories of your manuscript. This includes links to Ghub, mentions to GitHub sites, etc.
Finally, I have to note that if you do not fix these problems, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Peter Van Katwyk, 10 Apr 2025
reply
Dr. Añel,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. All of the data and code can be found within the Zenodo repository mentioned at the end of the existing statement, with additional details about ISMIP6 and the current ISEFlow versions being included for completeness. However, to better comply with GMD requirements, we have updated the Zenodo archive to clearly show the data and code, and altered the Code and Data Availability section to be as follows:
"Code and data availability. The processed datasets and code needed to reproduce the ISMIP6 data processing, model training, evaluation, and results for both ISEFlow-AIS and ISEFlow-GRIS are archived in a Zenodo repository found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15190429 (Van Katwyk et al., 2025). The original ISMIP6 datasets, from which ISEFlow training data was processed, can be found at the following: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11176 (Forcings), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11176023 (GrIS outputs), and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11176028 (AIS outputs). "
This change will be reflected in future versions of the manuscript. Thank you for your feedback.
Peter Van Katwyk
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870-AC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Apr 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. However, I would like to clarify an issue here. You state that you use ISMIP6 as input data for your work. However, it is not clear to me that you have provided such data here. After a quick check of your code, I have seen that you provide "EmulatorData" and "DeepEnsemble" data. Also, at least some of these input datasets seem to be in a binary format (it is not the case of the results, which seem to be in .csv). Therefore, please, clarify if your Zenodo repository contains the data necessary to replicate your work, namely the exact ISMIP6 data used. If it is not in the repository, we need that you add it.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870-CEC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Peter Van Katwyk, 14 Apr 2025
reply
Dr. Añel,
Yes, the data provided in the repository, specifically in the "iseflow-manscript/data/AIS" and "iseflow-manuscript/data/GrIS" directories, contains the complete dataset for replicating every part of this work. The data includes the training, validation, and testing data for each ice sheet emulator. Within each of these CSV files (train.csv, val.csv, test.csv), you will find the exact ISMIP6 forcings and model characteristics used as inputs, as well as the "SLE" column, which contains the outputs. The EmulatorDataset and DeepEnsemble in the code are just Python classes for handling specific processing steps of those train, val, and test datasets in the repository, and do not tie to other data that is not included. Hopefully this helps.
Peter
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870-AC2 -
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Apr 2025
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for the explanation, and your work to comply with the replicability of your manuscript. We can consider the current version of your manuscript in compliance with the Code and Data policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-870-CEC3
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Apr 2025
reply
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Peter Van Katwyk, 14 Apr 2025
reply
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 14 Apr 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Peter Van Katwyk, 10 Apr 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
157 | 61 | 11 | 229 | 4 | 6 |
- HTML: 157
- PDF: 61
- XML: 11
- Total: 229
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 110 | 49 |
Germany | 2 | 19 | 8 |
Australia | 3 | 13 | 5 |
Belgium | 4 | 10 | 4 |
Netherlands | 5 | 10 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 110