the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The incubation history of soil samples strongly affects the occlusion of particulate organic matter
Abstract. Soil structure is a key proxy for carbon and nutrient storage, stable pore space, erosion stability and rootability. It is often quantified based on the degree of aggregation or the mechanical stability of soil aggregates. This work compares two methods representing basic principles of aggregate measurement. Undisturbed soil samples of loamy sand, clayey silt and silty loam were analyzed by ultrasonication/density fractionation (USD) to quantify different soil organic carbon (SOC) pools and by wet-sieving to measure the amount of water stable aggregates (%WSA). The measurements were carried out on field-fresh soil as well as samples that were air-dried, reset to field capacity (pF 1.8) by capillary action and incubated for 0, 1 and 4 weeks. Our results show, that the strength of POM occlusion sharply decreases after rewetting and is not fully recovered within the following four weeks. In contrast, the amount of water stable aggregates (%WSA) remains largely stable except in clayey silt. In consequence, field-fresh measurements are highly recommended to avoid overestimation of free and weakly bound SOM fractions or erosion stability.
- Preprint
(824 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(134 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 02 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-771', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Apr 2025
reply
Dear Editor,
These are my comments about the paper 'The incubation history of soil samples strongly affects the occlusion of particulate organic matter', of Frederick Büks et al., submitted for publication to EGUsphere.
The paper is very nice, and the experimental work seems very carefully done. I congratulate authors. As you will see, I have few comments, and mostly are small details that authors may solve without too much problem.
SPECIFIC COMMENTSLine 28. Suppress 'but' at the end of the line (repeated word).
Line 45. '...application of defined quanta of ultrasonical stress'. What is a 'quanta' of ultrasonical stress? I suspect that you meant that a defined level or strength of energy (Watts) or physical work (Joules) is applied to the sample. If I am right, I suggest you put it in this way, easier to understand. If I am wrong, then try to be more clear about the concept ('quanta').
Line 62. 'And be there an air-dried sample'. Is it a direct translation from German? Dou you mean, simply 'If the soil sample is air-dried, the abrupt addition...'.
Line 101. Below the term 'pH' there is a dot between parentheses '(·)'. What does it mean? If unnecessary, I suggest to remove it.
Lines 301-304. This final comment is of interest. Authors are german, thus used to soils that rarely undergo a severe drought. But for a mediterranean like me, the extreme drought of summer months is a usual phenomenon, not an artifact of laboratory. To me the physical fractionation directly on dry samples may be an oportunity to study the reconfigurations happened in the soil (the precise architecture of particles, WSA, POM particles) during drought. May I suggest you mention this aspect of the problem.
FIGURESBe careful with Fig. 2. Letters are very small: it may become ilegible in the printed version. Even in the screen version, I had to increase the view to 150 to read the precise meaning of the Y-axis.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-771-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
34 | 9 | 4 | 47 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
- HTML: 34
- PDF: 9
- XML: 4
- Total: 47
- Supplement: 6
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 20 | 34 |
China | 2 | 9 | 15 |
Germany | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Spain | 4 | 3 | 5 |
undefined | 5 | 3 | 5 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 20