the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Deep learning-based object detection on LiDAR-derived hillshade images: Insights into grain size distribution and longitudinal sorting of debris flows
Abstract. Debris flows are hazardous natural phenomena characterized by rapid movements of sediment-water mixtures in steep channels, posing significant risks to life and infrastructure. This study introduces a novel method that leverages hillshade images derived from a high temporal resolution LiDAR scanner and deep learning-based object detection models to analyze debris-flow dynamics. By transforming 3D point clouds into hillshade projections, the method enables efficient detection and tracking of key flow features, including boulders, rolling boulders, surge waves, and woody debris, independent of ambient light conditions. Outputs include object velocities, sizes, and tracks, offering high-resolution insights into debris-flow phenomena such as longitudinal sorting. Six state-of-the-art object detection models were evaluated, with YOLOv11 achieving the best balance of precision, recall, and processing speed. The proposed framework is scalable, significantly reduces processing time compared to manual analysis, and sets the foundation for real-time monitoring and analysis of debris flows across diverse locations and conditions.
- Preprint
(6045 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 05 Oct 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-743', Pierluigi Confuorto, 17 Jul 2025
reply
I would like to thanks the editor and congratulate with the authors for giving me the opportunity to review this very interesting paper.
I find the research in its conception and in the methodologies applied extremely interesting and with many novel and innovative points. Moreover, its significance in the field of debris flow monitoring is very high.
I just have some minor comments and questions:
1- It is my understanding that using hillshade representation, only 2 dimensions can be analyzed. Is there any possible improvement to obtain also the vertical dimension, which could be very important to be estimated?
2- Would this methodology be implemented also to forecast trajectories of boulders and woods?
3-Which are the error bounds of the different size materials in terms of velocities using Sort and Bot Sort?
4- Can this method be extended to differentiate submerged vs. surface-level boulders?
As a mere suggestion on the arrangement of the paper, I would split section 2 into 2.1 Geological and geomorphological setting (providing more info about the catchment area) and 2.2 about the monitoring set up. I find it a little bit confusing as it is.
All the bestCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-743-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
346 | 98 | 11 | 455 | 8 | 19 |
- HTML: 346
- PDF: 98
- XML: 11
- Total: 455
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1