the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Is the summer aerosol over the Arctic controlled by regional atmospheric circulation or ice conditions? Trends and Future Implications
Abstract. Based on aerosol particle number size distributions measured ≥85º N on I/B Oden covering the summers of 1991, 1996, 2001, 2008 regional atmospheric circulation regimes (nodes) delineated with self-organizing maps (SOMs) were investigated as potential controllers of Arctic aerosol sources. The three most prominent nodes were not connected to regional source-related differences and did not vary systematically throughout the study period. Instead, the seasonal course of sea ice melt and freeze-up appeared to affect the shape of the aerosol size distributions significantly. High sub-Aitken concentrations occurred during the "freeze-up", most commonly associated with the low wind, restricted sea ice movement, and effective radiative cooling conditions. The high concentrations of newly formed particles measured during "freeze-up" were interpreted as deriving from frost flower formation. With the data on ice and atmospheric conditions and their seasonal course the study was extended to cover all years from 1991 to 2023 to enable speculations about changing aerosol source conditions in the warming Arctic climate. Over the 33 years of the study, the significant increases in sea and air temperatures nearly doubled the favorable ice conditions for new particle formation ≥85º N, lengthening both "melt" and "freeze-up" parts of the illuminated Arctic by more than a week. Whereas the sum effect of counteracting processes during the ice melt season on the airborne biogenic Arctic aerosol in a warming climate is unclear, the net effect of the changing the freeze-up of sea ice is expected to enhance the airborne biogenic Arctic aerosol in late summer/autumn.
- Preprint
(3964 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-695', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Jun 2025
General comment
The paper investigates potential source regions and ice-related factors affecting size distributions and newly formed particles in Arctic based on measured size distributions during five cruises of I/B Oden in the summers of 1991, 1996, 2001, 2008, and 2018. The topic is of interest and suitable for the Journal. A few aspects should be made more clear in a revision step, see my specific comments.
Specific comments
Section 2.2, lines 160-165. I understand that details are given in other papers, however, it would be useful to summarise here what instruments are used and their sizer range. In addition, if the different instruments have been compared one with the other and if size distribution of dried (i.e. low RH) air was measured.
Section 2.3 Do you have any idea of the boundary-layer height. I was wondering if the arrival height was above or within the boundary layer.
Figures 1 and 3 are very small to be readable. Authors should considering using a different layout.
Section 4. How the new particle formation events were determined? Or the discussion only consider small particles as newly formed?
Figure 8. What is the meaning of the peak around 100% visible in each graph?
Figure 12 and correlated discussion. It seems that there are very large differences between median values and average. This are likely due to large values influencing the average. However, the conclusions obtainable from media would be significantly different compared to those of average. Could you please comment in more detail this aspect. It could be useful to show a comparison of the incidence of new particle formation events in the two cases: melt and freeze-up periods.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-695-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Caroline Leck, 14 Sep 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-695/egusphere-2025-695-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Caroline Leck, 14 Sep 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-695', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Aug 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Caroline Leck, 14 Sep 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-695/egusphere-2025-695-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Caroline Leck, 14 Sep 2025
-
AC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-695', Caroline Leck, 14 Sep 2025
Dear Editor,
Thank you for sending us the reviews of our manuscript #egusphere-2025-695 “Is the summer aerosol over the Arctic controlled by regional atmospheric circulation or ice conditions? Trends and Future Implications”.
In response to the referee comments, we address the reviewers' (1 and 2) critiques (indicated in blue).
The requested changes have been incorporated into the revised manuscript, marked in blue.
We appreciate the reviewers’ thoughtful, constructive, and helpful comments.
Best regards,
Caroline Leck and co-authors (Jost Heinztenberg, Tuomas Naakka, and Tina Nygård)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-695-AC3
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
404 | 69 | 18 | 491 | 22 | 47 |
- HTML: 404
- PDF: 69
- XML: 18
- Total: 491
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 47
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1