the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Variations of the magnetic declination at mid-latitude European stations during the Carrington-like event on 29 October 2003
Abstract. Based on the declination observed at mid-latitude European stations, we studied the current system that is a candidate for the cause of the sharp drop in horizontal intensity (H) of the geomagnetic field that occurred in that part of the globe on 29 October 2003. The newest knowledge says that the current system consisted of a pair of field-aligned currents (FACs) forming a dayside current wedge: in the early afternoon sector, it was a stationary upward FAC, and in the dawn sector, it was a westward-moving downward FAC. We found the velocity of −1.08 °/min ± 0.38 °/min for the wedge centre, roughly half the velocity of the westward-moving downward FAC. Our results contribute to arguments that the dayside current wedge was the probable cause of the H-drop on 29 October 2003.
- Preprint
(440 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 04 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-686', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Mar 2025
reply
Review comments on the manuscript egusphere-2025-686, entitled: "Variations of the magnetic declination at mid-latitude European stations during the Carrington-like event on 29 October 2003" by Valach et al.
The authors have provided a concise study about the declination variations during the major Halloween storm in 2003. The observed declination changes are consistent with the dayside current wedge model presented by Ohtani (2022). As such, the paper provides a valuable contribution to confirming the model. I can recommend the publication of the manuscript after some minor revisions.
Abstract: Presently the text is very short. A few more words should be spent, describing the H drop during the storm, e.g. at which latitude is it observed, which local time? What is the importance of the H drop for your interpretation of the D components?
Fig. 2: This is a very busy plot with many curves. For improvement it should be enlarged and the presented time span truncated to 06 to 08 UT. This will improve the readability a little.
Fig. 5: The time for the dot, marking the ∆D minimum at STJ, seems to be very arbitrary. Applying a smoothing to the curves may help to come to more justified results.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-686-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Fridrich Valach, 11 Mar 2025
reply
Please find the replies to the Reviewer's comments in the attached file.
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Hermann Lühr, 12 Mar 2025
reply
The authors have replied to all my comments to my full satisfaction. With these changes included in the revised manuscript I can recommend it for publication in angeo.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-686-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Hermann Lühr, 12 Mar 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Fridrich Valach, 11 Mar 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
74 | 16 | 6 | 96 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 74
- PDF: 16
- XML: 6
- Total: 96
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 43 | 38 |
China | 2 | 18 | 16 |
Germany | 3 | 7 | 6 |
France | 4 | 6 | 5 |
Netherlands | 5 | 6 | 5 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 43