the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Anthropogenic air pollutants strongly interact with natural aerosols over the eastern China seas: key processes, size distributions, and seasonalities
Abstract. Marine aerosols play important roles in climate, marine biogeochemistry, and coastal air quality. Over the eastern China seas adjacent to densely populated East Asia, aerosols are mutually affected by anthropogenic pollution and natural emissions. However, the impacts of anthropogenic-natural interactions on aerosol composition and properties are not well understood due to limited systematic observations. Here we characterized the composition of size-resolved aerosols over this region across four seasonal cruise campaigns, identifying major aerosol sources and influencing processes. Aerosol mass concentrations typically show trimodal distributions, with fine-mode mass dominating in spring and winter due to strong influences of continental pollution. However, in 40.9 % of samples, continental secondary aerosols are highly aged, lacking a fine-mode NO3– peak. Gaseous HNO3 evaporated from continental secondary aerosols and anthropogenic NOx react with natural dust and sea spray aerosols (SSA), forming coarse-mode NO3–, which contributes 43.2 % and 12.7 % of total NO3–, respectively. This shifts NO3– from fine to coarse mode, altering the spatial pattern of nitrogen deposition and its ecological effects. Additionally, 27.7 % of SSA Cl– is depleted on average, reaching 40.8 % in summer, which is an important source of reactive halogens that affect ozone chemistry. Shipping emissions contribute to ~20 % of SO42– in spring and summer before the International Maritime Organization’s 2020 regulation, but this contribution likely decreases by one order of magnitude thereafter. This analysis highlights the importance of anthropogenic-natural interactions over coastal seas, underscoring the need for further studies to assess their subsequent environmental impacts.
- Preprint
(1109 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(587 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 05 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-678', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Apr 2025
reply
This manuscript investigates the seasonal chemical composition of particulate matter over the eastern China seas, based on shipborne measurements. A Size-resolved PMF analysis was employed to analyze the chemical composition data, and the effects of shipping emissions were discussed. Readers are frequently required to cross-reference multiple figures—often out of sequential order—to understand the presented arguments. For example, the discussion in Lines 299–307 necessitates referencing Figures 3 and 8 simultaneously, which disrupts the flow. A thorough reorganization of the manuscript structure and figure arrangement is strongly recommended to enhance readability.
Moreover, the key scientific conclusions are insufficiently clear. The title highlights the interaction between anthropogenic emissions and natural aerosols, but the main text lacks adequate discussion or supporting evidence on this topic. As currently presented, the work is more akin to a “measurement report” than a comprehensive “research article.” Nevertheless, it may be considered for publication after the following major concerns are fully addressed:
- Line 266-267: Is there any literature or observational evidence supporting the shift of nitrate from fine to coarse particles? I am also curious whether coagulation effects could contribute to the observed increase in coarse-mode nitrate concentrations. Since the coagulation of smaller particles may lead to the formation of larger ones—or smaller particles could be scavenged by larger particles—this process could also result in a shift of chemical species toward larger size fractions.
- Section 3.3: The PMF model analyzed size-resolved chemical composition. However, the PMF factors were characterized by the size-integrated concentration. It is recommended to characterize PMF factors by both their size-integrated contributions and their mass size distributions. Additionally, diagnostic plots such as the Q/Qexp plot should be included in the SI to demonstrate the model’s performance.
- Line 254-255: It is advisable to clearly indicate the co-transport events in Figure 8. Moreover, the specific dates of these events should be provided. Please clarify the method used to identify these events—was it based on abrupt changes in mass concentrations, backward trajectory analysis, or another approach?
- Line 257-258: A discussion of the mass distribution of NO3- and SO42- of each factor would be very helpful.
- Line 258-259: Please consider quantifying and presenting the mass contributions of different PMF factors to NO₃⁻. A bar chart or tabulated data could greatly improve clarity.
- Line 280-283: Can the author provide a rough estimate of the mass contribution of the NaNO₃ formation pathway to coarse-mode nitrate? Since the conclusion is primarily based on size distribution data, it would be more convincing to support it with additional evidence or quantitative estimation.
- Line 294-296: Please specify which figure or table supports this conclusion. It is important to ensure that every claim is clearly linked to the corresponding data presentation.
- Line 301-302: It is difficult to identify the “strong impact” samples in Figure 3. Consider providing a separate figure showing the size distribution of NO₃⁻ during the periods classified as having strong anthropogenic influence. Additionally, please clarify the criteria used to define these periods.
- Line 303-304: Please provide some discussion of air masses, such as wind filed in different seasons or backward trajectory analysis.
- Line 305-306: Please specify which sample(s) in Figure 3 were influenced by sea fog conditions. A note or label in the figure would help readers easily identify these cases.
- Line 308-310: The R² value in Figure S5 represents the fit of the linear regression model for PM₁.₈ mass. However, it does not necessarily imply that CS&B and AC&MS explain 70% of the variance in PM₁.₈. Notably, the regression slope is about 0.5, suggesting that CS&B and AC&MS jointly account for only ~50% of PM₁.₈ mass. Please revise this statement to accurately reflect the regression results.
- Line 310-311: Please clarify what is meant by “explained variance.” If referring to statistical variance explained by regression, it should be supported with appropriate statistical metrics.
- 10: I It is unexpected that the aged sea salt factor contributes notably to NO₃⁻ in the fine size range (0.1–0.32 μm). The manuscript previously suggested negligible fine-mode NO₃⁻ for highly aged aerosols. Please provide further explanation or hypothesis for this observation.
- Line 341-342: How was the “3.4 times” increase calculated? Was this based on empirical data or cited from previous literature? Please clarify the basis and, if calculated, include the equation or data used.
- Line 342-345: Same concern as in Comment 11: The use of R² and the slope should be carefully interpreted. Please rephrase this sentence to ensure the conclusion aligns with the regression outcome
- Line 345-346: Please provide data corresponding to strong dust transport events. Clarify which specific samples were collected during these events and consider highlighting them in relevant figures or tables.
- Line 351-354: Please elaborate on how the faster reaction rate of aged sea salt results in a smaller median particle diameter. Could you also provide a rough estimation or reference regarding the reaction rate differences between aged and fresh sea salt?
- Line 356-357: Clarify how the chloride depletion ratio was determined. Was it calculated from molar ratios of Na⁺ and Cl⁻ in the measurement data, or derived from another method?
- Line 376-378: Please present the seasonal variation in the size distribution of Ca²⁺ in either figure or tabular format to support the corresponding discussion.
- Line 387-394: Although the text discusses the seasonal variation of V and Ni, the corresponding data are not presented. Please include a figure or table showing the concentration and size distribution of V and Ni in different seasons.
- Line 464: Please provide additional evidence to support the claim of fine-mode NH₄NO₃ decomposition, such as thermodynamic analysis, ambient temperature data, or references to previous studies
- Line 474-477: Bromide and halogen radicals are mentioned in the conclusion, yet they are not discussed in the main body of the text. Please either integrate the relevant discussion into the manuscript or remove this sentence from the conclusion to avoid confusion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-678-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91 | 27 | 8 | 126 | 13 | 6 | 7 |
- HTML: 91
- PDF: 27
- XML: 8
- Total: 126
- Supplement: 13
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 44 | 35 |
China | 2 | 20 | 16 |
France | 3 | 9 | 7 |
undefined | 4 | 9 | 7 |
Germany | 5 | 6 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 44