the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Seismic Acquisition, Modelling, and Data Analysis of Antarctic subglacial lakes
Abstract. Subglacial lakes are crucial for studying life evolution, ice sheet dynamics, and climate change. Lake Qilin, located in the Princess Elizabeth Land region of East Antarctica, is the second largest subglacial lake discovered in Antarctica. Studying its microbial communities and biogeochemical cycles provides valuable insights into Earth's life evolution and the search for extraterrestrial life. To advance this research, China plans to conduct clean drilling and water sampling in Lake Qilin from 2025 to 2027. Additionally, during the 41th Chinese National Antarctica Research Expedition, active-source seismic exploration will be conducted to obtain high-resolution imaging, guiding drilling site selection. This study provides theoretical support for these efforts by developing a representative velocity model for subglacial lakes, simulating wavefields to characterize seismic responses, processing simulated data to identify processing challenges, and evaluating acquisition systems to determine the optimal survey geometry for Lake Qilin exploration. The results demonstrate that, in addition to primary reflections, multiples and guided waves will prominently develop in the seismic wavefield. Conventional seismic data processing of multiples introduce false coherent events, complicating seismic interpretation. Furthermore, the full-coverage acquisition system is identified as the optimal approach for the Lake Qilin exploration. To validate our simulation results, seismic data from Thwaites Glacier were processed and analyzed, and the results aligning well with part of our simulations, thus confirming the accuracy of the theoretical framework.
- Preprint
(28431 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-646', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Jun 2025
The authors provide a thorough analysis of seismic modeling under various conditions, revealing complex multiples and strong guided waves associated with subglacial lakes. Additionally, the NMO-stacked images highlight the challenges in accurate velocity estimation. The comparison of different survey configurations offers valuable guidance for future active-source seismic exploration of subglacial environments. Furthermore, the field data supports these findings. Overall, this paper is detailed and informative, and I believe it should be accepted. I have only one minor suggestion: both Sections 3.3 and 4.5 are titled "Discussion." To improve clarity, they should be renamed to reflect their specific focus—for example, "Discussion on Seismic Data Processing" and "Discussion on Seismic Acquisition System."
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-646-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', yuqing chen, 24 Jul 2025
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your constructive feedback. We will revise unclear section headings such as “Discussion” in the revised paper to improve clarity.
Kai Lu and Yuqing Chen
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-646-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', yuqing chen, 24 Jul 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-646', Alex Brisbourne, 19 Jun 2025
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', yuqing chen, 24 Jul 2025
Dear Dr. Alex Brisbourne,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful and constructive comments during the review process. We have provided detailed point-by-point responses to all the issues you raised, which are included in the attached file for your review. Your feedback has been very helpful in improving our work. In the revised manuscript, we will not only address the specific concerns you pointed out, but also incorporate additional insights inspired by your suggestions.
Best regards,
Kai Lu and Yuqing Chen
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC2', yuqing chen, 24 Jul 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-646', Coen Hofstede, 19 Jun 2025
Review of manuscript egusphere-2025-646
Seismic Acquisition, Modelling, and Data Analysis of Antarctic subglacial lakes
by: Kai Lu and Yuqing Chen
Bremerhaven June 18, 2025
Dear Authors
I really enjoyed this paper. It‘s well written, well-structured and a (to my mind almost) complete pre study of an upcoming seismic survey over the 2nd largest subglacial lake in East Antarctice, Lake Qilin. What active seismic method is best to locate a suitable drilling spot in this lake is the key question. The researchers used a geometrically simple acoustic velocity model of a 10km survey line over a hypothetical subglacial lake to create synthetic seismograms that are processed. In five steps the model becomes more complex and realistic, allowing identification of the received signals in these synthetic seismograms. Once these results are analyzed and discussed, three active seismic methods are analyzed and discussed. Their conclusions are used to analyze real data from Thwaites Glacier collected by one of the three methods.
The five models offer a lot of great examples and the stepwise built up is clear and good. However, I think it would have been great and logic to add one more step having the most realistic scenario for lake Qilin: a free boundary, firn layer and sediment bed. That would create seismograms you can expect to find doing a seismic survey over the lake.
My main concern are the conclusions as to what active seismic method is most effective to survey a subglacial lake. These are based on the modeled synthetic data sets and especially the workload definition seems hypothetical. Although these synthetic datasets offer clear insights as to fold, nr of shots, offset ranges and equipment needed, they ignore the reality of field work. Having to plant and dig out geophones, drill holes for shots and move equipment around is. I think here it is important to look at actual field data collection. I’ll recommend two papers that describe data collection and results in the field using a snow streamer and vibrator combination, (https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086187) and (https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2051-2022). We typically collect 20 km high quality 10-fold data daily with this set-up with three persons, a technician and two operators. Regarding the actual workload in the field: last season (ITGC-GHOST) at Thwaites Glacier, with the leap frog method, 13.5 km were collected in 9 days with 6 to 8 persons. The vibe-streamer method 137 km 10-fold data were collected in 12 days with three persons. When using explosives as a source with snow streamer, a fast efficient way to collect data is to use detonating cord on the surface. This is a fast source, has a large bandwidth, good resolution, no ghost, and in combination with a snow streamer is again much faster than frog-leap.
The figures of the models are generally good and need but sometimes need a better description and more information. Especially the captions seem somewhat hastily formulated with minimal information. This caused me to puzzle as to what is actually been shown.
The figures presenting the field data need better resolution. Also here the captions must be improved.
I attach the manuscript with my specific comments.
Thank you for this interesting manuscript.
Coen Hofstede,
coen.hofstede@awi.de
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC3', yuqing chen, 24 Jul 2025
Dear Dr Coen Hofstede,
Thank you very much for your positive and encouraging feedback. We’re glad to hear that you found the paper well-structured. Your comments are very insightful and valuable to us. Below, we provide detailed point-to-point responses to the issues you raised. These responses have been compiled in the attached file for your reference. We will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve both clarity and relevance.
We sincerely appreciate your time and effort in reviewing our work.
Best regards,
Kai Lu and Yuqing Chen
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC3', yuqing chen, 24 Jul 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
356 | 378 | 22 | 756 | 10 | 21 |
- HTML: 356
- PDF: 378
- XML: 22
- Total: 756
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1