Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-639
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-639
25 Mar 2025
 | 25 Mar 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

XCO2 observations compared to km-scale ICON-ART simulations indicate an underestimation of Thessaloniki’s emissions in the ODIAC inventory

Lena Feld, Pablo Schmid, Marios Mermigkas, Dimitrios Balis, Jochen Gross, Darko Dubravica, Carlos Alberti, Benedikt Herkommer, Stefan Versick, Roland Ruhnke, Frank Hase, and Peter Braesicke

Abstract. An accurate inventory of CO2 emissions is important for the implementation of effective reduction measures and thus for climate change mitigation. Most current inventories are based on reported activities and rely little or not at all on atmospheric data. However, these inventories have large uncertainties, especially for smaller scales such as urban areas. For example, for the city of Thessaloniki, Greece, the EDGAR inventory reports 3.1 Mt, which differs by 72 % from the emission estimate of the ODIAC inventory (1.8 Mt) for the same area for the year 2019. With a measurement campaign in the framework of the Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON), we collected observations for three months in October 2021 and summer 2022 in Thessaloniki. A total of 30 days of column averaged molar fractions of CO2 (XCO2) were recorded. We combine these data with km-scale simulations from the numerical weather prediction model ICON-ART. The ODIAC inventory was used for simulating the emission of CO2. We optimized the simulated atmospheric time series of XCO2 to best match the observed data by scaling the prior emissions using a least-squares approach. With different configurations, we found a consistent up-scaling of the prior emissions, with total emissions ranging from 2.9 to 4.4 Mt in the urban area of Thessaloniki. This estimate is significantly higher than the emissions reported in ODIAC. The result demonstrates the potential of including ground-based column measurements of CO2 in the construction of emission estimates to reduce uncertainties at the urban scale.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Lena Feld, Pablo Schmid, Marios Mermigkas, Dimitrios Balis, Jochen Gross, Darko Dubravica, Carlos Alberti, Benedikt Herkommer, Stefan Versick, Roland Ruhnke, Frank Hase, and Peter Braesicke

Status: open (until 07 May 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Lena Feld, Pablo Schmid, Marios Mermigkas, Dimitrios Balis, Jochen Gross, Darko Dubravica, Carlos Alberti, Benedikt Herkommer, Stefan Versick, Roland Ruhnke, Frank Hase, and Peter Braesicke
Lena Feld, Pablo Schmid, Marios Mermigkas, Dimitrios Balis, Jochen Gross, Darko Dubravica, Carlos Alberti, Benedikt Herkommer, Stefan Versick, Roland Ruhnke, Frank Hase, and Peter Braesicke

Viewed

Total article views: 104 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
76 21 7 104 3 4
  • HTML: 76
  • PDF: 21
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 104
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 104 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 104 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
Our goal is to measure CO2 emissions from cities, to verify and improve our knowledge of reported anthropogenic emissions. We use atmospheric measurements and simulations of CO2 transport to find an independent estimate. This study investigates the CO2 emissions of the city of Thessaloniki, where the reported emissions differ. The data we collected indicates that the emissions are larger than stated by the ODIAC inventory, which we used for our simulations.
Share