the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Spatiotemporal Evaluation of Vertical Dynamics Propagation of Flash Drought and Driving Mechanisms in the Indus Basin in South Asia (1970–2023)
Abstract. Flash drought (FD) leads to relatively short periods of anomalously low and rapid decreasing soil moisture (SM), which can significantly affect vegetation growth and ecosystem. However, the vertical propagation characteristics and driving mechanisms of FD through soil columns remain largely unknown, which is crucial for guiding agricultural and ecological disaster prevention and reduction. Here, we present a multi-layer FD evaluation method to explore the vertical propagation of FD at different soil depths (0–10 cm, 10–40 cm, and 100 cm), and based on the GLDAS data we comprehensively evaluate the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms of FD during 1970–2023 in the Indus Basin, a highly climate-sensitive region. We find that the frequency of FD decreases with increasing soil depth, while the relationship between the rate of intensification (RI) and drought severity varies with soil depth, with stronger correlation (r2>0.9) in the middle and root zone soil layers than in the upper layer. We further identify 2148 simultaneous events (‘t’) and 1154 subsequent events (‘t+1’) between the upper and middle soil layers, which mostly occur during spring and early summer. The temporal differences in the ‘t+1’ FD events are closely related to the persistence of meteorological conditions. In contrast, the ‘t’ events are caused by the simultaneous depletion of SM from the upper layer to the deeper layer, indicating the rapid development of FD conditions due to deeper moisture loss. The analysis also highlights the significant spatial heterogeneity of FD characteristics, with the humid and sub-humid regions in the middle Indus basin being the most sensitive to FD, and precipitation deficit and high temperature are the dominant driving forces for FD occurrence.
- Preprint
(2135 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-625', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Mar 2025
reply
Dear Dr. Rohini Kumar,
Thank you for inviting me to review the manuscript, "Spatiotemporal Evaluation of Vertical Dynamics Propagation of Flash Drought and Driving Mechanisms in the Indus Basin in South Asia (1970–2023)” by Khurshid et al (egusphere-2025-625). Here are my comments.
General comments:
This manuscript investigates the vertical propagation of flash drought in the Indus Basin, South Asia, over the period 1970-2023. The topic is interesting, and the manuscript is generally well-written. However, the overall quality needs improvement. The current results do not sufficiently illustrate the driving mechanisms behind vertical flash drought propagation. Several critical issues related to datasets, methodology, and results require further clarification. Therefore, I recommend major revisions for this manuscript.
Specific comments:
- The GLDAS dataset includes multiple versions with different spatial and temporal resolutions, such as GLDAS-NOAH, GLDAS-CLSM, and GLDAS-VIC. The authors should explicitly specify which dataset was used.
- The authors employ 0-10 cm, 10-40 cm and 100 cm soil depths for flash drought identification. However, the meaning of 100 cm layer is unclear. Does it refer to 40-100 cm and 0-100 cm? Additionally, the authors state their intention to explore vertical flash drought propagation from upper layer to the root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) layer. But RZSM is commonly defined as the 0-100 cm soil layer, which appears inconsistent with previous definition of middle layer (10-40 cm).
- The rationale behind selecting the four variables for flash drought analysis needs to be elaborated. I am confused why wind speed is included, given that it does not directly induce a rapid increase in soil moisture. On the other hand, some critical hydrometeorological variables such as potential evapotranspiration, vapor pressure deficit, and solar radiation should be considered, as they are commonly associated with flash drought occurrence and development.
- Figure 3 presents inconsistencies in flash drought occurrences across different soil layers. For example, subplot (h) suggests that the number of flash drought events at 100 cm is highest in the southern areas, exceeding 32 events. However, in panel (e), the number of events in the 10-40 cm is below 20 for the same areas. This implies cases where deeper soil moisture depletion occurs while the middle soil layer remains relatively unaffected, which seems counterintuitive. Similar inconsistencies are also observed in panels (f) and (i).
- The study primarily focuses on the severity of flash droughts. However, it is equally important to examine their duration, as severity is closely linked to drought durations. The authors should provide an analysis of flash drought duration across different soil layers. Does the upper soil layer experience shorter flash drought duration than deeper layers? Is this result relevant to the weak correlations observed in Figure 6 between RI and severity in the upper soil layer?
- The definition of vertical flash drought propagation process remains unclear. The classification of “t” events appears to indicate the simultaneous occurrences of flash droughts in different soil layers, but this does not necessarily imply propagation. Additional evidence is needed to demonstrate that upper-layer flash droughts propagate into deeper layers in the so-called “t” and “t+1” events.
- The current results (Figure 9) do not convincingly demonstrate the influence of hydrometeorological variables on the occurrence of “t” and “t+1” events. More results, similar to Figure 10, should be included to identify the critical variables driving these events and to illustrate the underlying mechanisms of vertical flash drought propagation.
- In Figure 8, the variations in precipitation from lag-2 to lag0 appear smaller than those of evapotranspiration and temperature, suggesting that ET and T may exhibit stronger correlations with flash drought occurrence. However, this contrasts with the findings in Figure 10, where precipitation is identified as the key driver of flash droughts. The authors should clarify this inconsistency.
- I suggest using (a)-(h) for subplot labels instead of “i)”and “ii)”in Figure 9.
- It is unclear which soil layer is represented in Figure 10. 0~10 cm, 10~40 cm, or 100 cm? Additionally, why does the study not analyze the driving factors for flash droughts across all three soil layers? It would be informative to determine whether the dominant factors remain consistent across different soil depths.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-625-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99 | 16 | 3 | 118 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 99
- PDF: 16
- XML: 3
- Total: 118
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1