Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6224
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6224
27 Dec 2025
 | 27 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Identification of diagenetic overprint and recrystallization of foraminiferal shell calcite by Electron Backscattered Diffraction (EBSD)

Anna Sancho Vaquer, Erika Griesshaber, Julie Meilland, Xiaofei Yin, Michael Siccha, Michal Kucera, and Wolfgang W. Schmahl

Abstract. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) measurements and data evaluation render the mode of crystal organization in the scanned sample volume, many crystallographic attributes of the comprising crystals and structural information of the entire hard tissue. Knowledge is gained on crystal microstructure, crystal texture, degree of misorientation and/or co-orientation between crystals, crystal-twin-formation, among others. As foraminiferal Ca-carbonate records chemical and physical parameters of the ambient environment, the shells serve as archives for environmental and climate change. However, the recorded information is often biased due to the alteration of shell Ca-carbonate by dissolution, precipitation, recrystallization, and the transformation of the biocrystals into their inorganic analogues.

We demonstrate that the diagenetic overprint of foraminiferal Ca-carbonate can be identified using structural characteristics measured with EBSD and information obtained from the corresponding data evaluation. We investigated modern/pristine and fossil Trilobatus sacculifer shells and highlighted an undisturbed shell surface for both. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that there is an increase in recrystallized calcite in the shells and a decrease in pristine, twinned calcite with increasing fossilization. We show that crystal microstructure and texture, and the frequency of the 60°-{001}-twin-misorientation and other misorientations are modified with an increasing degree of overprint. We propose the use of structural attributes provided by EBSD to identify recrystallized/overprinted foraminiferal carbonate. Highlighting low degrees of overprint is of main importance as, in contrast to strong overprint, small structural changes of overprinted shells are easily overlooked with SEM-imaging, while even a minute change of shell microstructure and texture is easily identified with EBSD measurements.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Anna Sancho Vaquer, Erika Griesshaber, Julie Meilland, Xiaofei Yin, Michael Siccha, Michal Kucera, and Wolfgang W. Schmahl

Status: open (until 07 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Anna Sancho Vaquer, Erika Griesshaber, Julie Meilland, Xiaofei Yin, Michael Siccha, Michal Kucera, and Wolfgang W. Schmahl
Anna Sancho Vaquer, Erika Griesshaber, Julie Meilland, Xiaofei Yin, Michael Siccha, Michal Kucera, and Wolfgang W. Schmahl
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Microscopic features in shells of marine organisms store crucial information about past environments, which can be altered after burial. This study uses a shell crystal structure measurement method to explore shell crystal change by comparing modern and fossil shells. A characteristic structural signal in the shells decreases as alteration increases. Even very small changes can be measured. This proves that this method can reliably identify such changes.
Share