Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6126
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6126
30 Dec 2025
 | 30 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Methane intensity and emissions across major oil and gas basins and individual jurisdictions using MethaneSAT observations

James P. Williams, Joshua Benmergui, Marvin Knapp, Mark Omara, Anthony Himmelberger, Ethan Kyzivat, Kaiya Weatherby, Ben Lyke, Jack Warren, Katlyn MacKay, Sasha Ayvazov, Marcus Russi, Nicholas LoFaso, Tom Melendez, Christopher C. Miller, Sebastien Roche, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan Franklin, Maya Nasr, Zhan Zhang, David Miller, Bingkun Luo, Luis Guanter, Steven P. Hamburg, Stephen C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam

Abstract. Mitigating global anthropogenic methane emissions is widely recognized as an effective strategy to reduce near-term climate warming. Here, we use satellite observations from MethaneSAT (2024–2025) to characterize methane emissions from major oil and gas basins worldwide. MethaneSAT addresses a critical gap in access to quantitative measurements of spatially distributed area emissions, providing high-resolution (~4 km × 4 km), wide-swath (220–440 km) coverage. We analyze aggregated MethaneSAT emissions across six major oil and gas producing regions: the Permian (USA), San Joaquin (USA), Eagle Ford (USA/Mexico), Amu Darya (Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan), and the Zagros Foldbelt (Iran/Iraq). Regional oil and gas emissions span more than an order of magnitude, ranging from 408 t h⁻¹ (95% CI: 303–516 t h⁻¹) for the Permian basin to 30 t h⁻¹ (95% CI: 20.3–41.1 t h⁻¹) in the San Joaquin basin. Methane intensities also vary substantially across basins and sub-basins, with more than an order of magnitude variation in both production-normalized and energy-normalized metrics. These differences reflect diverse factors, including contrasts in oil versus gas production, infrastructure age, contributions of lower-producing wells, and presence or absence of emission mitigation practices. Across jurisdictions, including counties and districts, we find consistent underestimation by gridded EPA-GHGI and EDGAR bottom-up inventories relative to MethaneSAT-derived emissions. Overall, MethaneSAT data provide basin-wide and sub-regional insights into methane emissions and intensities, offering critical scientific and policy-relevant information to support targeted and effective methane mitigation strategies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
James P. Williams, Joshua Benmergui, Marvin Knapp, Mark Omara, Anthony Himmelberger, Ethan Kyzivat, Kaiya Weatherby, Ben Lyke, Jack Warren, Katlyn MacKay, Sasha Ayvazov, Marcus Russi, Nicholas LoFaso, Tom Melendez, Christopher C. Miller, Sebastien Roche, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan Franklin, Maya Nasr, Zhan Zhang, David Miller, Bingkun Luo, Luis Guanter, Steven P. Hamburg, Stephen C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam

Status: open (until 10 Feb 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
James P. Williams, Joshua Benmergui, Marvin Knapp, Mark Omara, Anthony Himmelberger, Ethan Kyzivat, Kaiya Weatherby, Ben Lyke, Jack Warren, Katlyn MacKay, Sasha Ayvazov, Marcus Russi, Nicholas LoFaso, Tom Melendez, Christopher C. Miller, Sebastien Roche, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan Franklin, Maya Nasr, Zhan Zhang, David Miller, Bingkun Luo, Luis Guanter, Steven P. Hamburg, Stephen C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam
James P. Williams, Joshua Benmergui, Marvin Knapp, Mark Omara, Anthony Himmelberger, Ethan Kyzivat, Kaiya Weatherby, Ben Lyke, Jack Warren, Katlyn MacKay, Sasha Ayvazov, Marcus Russi, Nicholas LoFaso, Tom Melendez, Christopher C. Miller, Sebastien Roche, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan Franklin, Maya Nasr, Zhan Zhang, David Miller, Bingkun Luo, Luis Guanter, Steven P. Hamburg, Stephen C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, and satellite observations are critical for reducing emissions. Using 2024–2025 MethaneSAT data, we quantify methane emissions across six major oil and gas basins at high resolution, revealing substantial underestimation at basin, subbasin, and local levels. Our results underscore the need for new, spatially resolved measurements and the continued advancement of remote sensing capabilities to provide more detailed, actionable insights for methane mitigation.
Share