Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6058
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6058
12 Dec 2025
 | 12 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Assessing the stability of LSTM runoff projections in Switzerland under climate scenarios

Fabien Courvoisier, Basil Kraft, Yann Yasser Haddad, Massimiliano Zappa, and Lukas Gudmundsson

Abstract. Climate change is intensifying the global water cycle, altering both mean runoff and extremes, and strengthening the need for reliable hydrological projections to support adaptation. Traditionally, such projections have relied on process-based models. More recently, machine learning models, and in particular Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, have shown strong skill in predicting and reconstructing runoff from observations, raising interest in their use for hydrological projections. However, their ability to provide stable and physically credible results when forced with future climates beyond their training domain remains largely unexplored. Here we evaluate this question in Switzerland, a region strongly exposed to warming due to its alpine environment and glacier influence. An LSTM trained on observed meteorological and discharge data is driven with CH2018 climate and glacier projections for 1981–2100, and benchmarked against Hydro-CH2018 simulations from the process-based model PREVAH under identical forcings. Results show that the LSTM reproduces key hydrological signals closely – wetter winters, drier summers, and elevation-dependent trends – consistently across catchments and climate chains. Divergences are most pronounced in alpine and glacier-fed catchments, where runoff dynamics are more complex, yet the main governing patterns are captured. The largest limitation arises for extremes, where the LSTM underestimates peak flows, consistent with previously reported saturation effects. Overall, this study demonstrates that LSTMs can deliver robust mean-flow projections and trends comparable to a process-based benchmark, while highlighting persistent challenges in representing hydrological extremes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Fabien Courvoisier, Basil Kraft, Yann Yasser Haddad, Massimiliano Zappa, and Lukas Gudmundsson

Status: open (until 23 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Fabien Courvoisier, Basil Kraft, Yann Yasser Haddad, Massimiliano Zappa, and Lukas Gudmundsson
Fabien Courvoisier, Basil Kraft, Yann Yasser Haddad, Massimiliano Zappa, and Lukas Gudmundsson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Climate change strongly modifies runoff in alpine regions like Switzerland, altering water supply and affecting both human sectors and natural ecosystems. We test whether a model that learns only from past observations can credibly project future runoff under climate scenarios. It captures major expected shifts and reveals known limits for extremes. Its speed and ability to generalize across catchments make it a promising tool for assessing climate impacts on water resources.
Share