Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6007
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6007
11 Dec 2025
 | 11 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Assessment of seismicity and risk from gas injection in the Groningen gas field

Sander Osinga, Olwijn Leeuwenburgh, Bouko Vogelaar, Santiago Pena Clavijo, and Simona Bottero

Abstract. Production of natural gas from the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands has led to earthquakes, the societal impact of which has ultimately led to the decision to cease all gas production from the field starting October 2023. Seismicity is expected to continue for some time, even after production has stopped, at least in part because of the existing pressure gradients in the field and the time that it will take for gas to re-distribute and pressure to equilibrate. We investigate the possibility to reduce the seismicity by means of gas injection. We employ a dedicated model chain previously developed to model gas production, induced seismicity, and associated hazard and risk. The model chain was adapted to support modelling of pressure increases associated with gas injection, and to account for the effects of reservoir cooling when relatively cold gas is injected. Several injection scenarios are considered that are based on realistically feasible total injection gas volumes. Additional scenarios are designed to provide useful insight into fundamental mechanisms. The scenarios are compared to a no-injection reference case to be able to identify and quantify beneficial effects. The results indicate that reductions in seismicity can be achieved in all scenarios and that these reductions could be substantial also for relatively modest volumes of injection gas. The results also show that benefits may be lost if injection is stopped before reservoir-wide equilibration has been achieved. We discuss also some limitations of the model chain and highlight possibilities to deploy more targeted injection schemes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sander Osinga, Olwijn Leeuwenburgh, Bouko Vogelaar, Santiago Pena Clavijo, and Simona Bottero

Status: open (until 22 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sander Osinga, Olwijn Leeuwenburgh, Bouko Vogelaar, Santiago Pena Clavijo, and Simona Bottero

Data sets

Inputdata for Nitrogen Injection study Groningen gas field Sander Osinga and Olwijn Leeuwenburgh https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17232637

Model code and software

Seismic source model Sander Osinga et al. https://github.com/TNO/SHRA-Groningen-seismic-source-model

Sander Osinga, Olwijn Leeuwenburgh, Bouko Vogelaar, Santiago Pena Clavijo, and Simona Bottero
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 11 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Gas production from the Groningen gas field caused felt earthquakes, resulting in the field being closed in 2023. Despite this, earthquakes are expected to continue for years to come. We investigate whether injection of gas may be used to reduce the earthquakes. We use models that were developed to relate gas production to earthquakes, and adapted them to model injection. We find that relatively small amounts of injected gas are already expected to significantly reduce the earthquake risk.
Share