the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The thermal future of a regulated river: spatiotemporal dynamics of stream temperature under climate change
Abstract. Climate change is driving an increase in river water temperatures, presenting challenges for aquatic ecosystems and water management. Many rivers are also regulated by hydropower, altering their natural thermal dynamics and how these respond to changing climate. This study examines how the thermal regime of a peri-alpine regulated river could evolve under future climate scenarios using a high-resolution process-based model. Projections indicate that mean annual water temperatures may rise by up to 4 °C by 2080–2090 under Representative Concentration Pathways 8.5, with daily mean temperatures exceeding 15 °C for nearly half the year, raising ecological concerns. While these trends are comparable to those in unregulated rivers, river regulation introduces distinct spatial and seasonal patterns in climate change impacts. The reach with only a residual flow is particularly susceptible to warming due to limited discharge, whereas deep reservoir releases help moderate climate change impacts downstream of the dam and the hydropower plant. Furthermore, unlike in unregulated rivers where the strongest warming typically occurs in summer, climate change impacts in this regulated system are projected to be most pronounced in autumn and winter due to the thermal inertia of the reservoir. Indicators used to assess thermopeaking impacts remain largely unaffected by climate change, provided that hydropower operation remains unchanged. This study highlights that while regulation can exacerbate vulnerabilities to climate change, it also mitigates climate change impacts by influencing river temperature dynamics beyond thermopeaking alone.
- Preprint
(2350 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-599', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Apr 2025
reply
This is a well written, properly organized manuscript on how river temperatures in regulated rivers may change under climate change. The authors find that, while river temperatures do increase under climate change, they do so in different ways than unregulated rivers. The results seem robust; my concerns are largely on the methodological approach with perhaps additional clarification and discussion points needed. See below for major and minor comments.
Major comments
[1] This is regarding applicability to other river reaches/watersheds. Could the authors comment and include a short discussion in the paper on whether these findings are applicable to other regions in the world? Are the findings presented in the paper solely due to this particular reach and perhaps due to the intricacies of this reache’s reservoir management?
[2] Why do the authors use the older RCPs rather than the new SSPs? I am not suggesting that the authors redo their analyses, but the use of older RCPs need justification.
[3] The depth of water released from the reservoir affects river temperatures, where water released from the top of the reservoir is more closely related to air temperature. Are the reservoirs in this reach able to release water at different depths? If so, do they release water at different depths to buffer changes in river temperatures? The authors mention that water temperatures are measured at multiple depths, but it is not clear if they use this data other than to develop air-water temperature relationships. This should be at least discussed in the methodology and discussion sections. More on how the authors handle the depth of water releases, and how that relates to water temperatures, is needed.
[4] The authors use CH2018 data to generate hydrologic projections. Does this dataset assume natural conditions without reservoirs? If it includes reservoirs, how was this handled in the projections?
[5] From what I understand, the authors use the Hydro-CH2018 dataset for nearby tributaries (or analogue catchments) for the unregulated rivers feeding into this reach. This is done because the Glane and Gerine are not part of the Hydro-CH2018 dataset. This seems a little problematic since a river’s reaction to precipitation events can vary widely based on geology, soil type, land use, etc. Without explicit modeling there’s also no way to know how the sensitivity of these rivers may change under climate change. Could the authors comment on this? Did the authors do any statistical analysis to bolster the use of different rivers as proxies?
[6] Is snow a large component of the hydrology in this region? Snow and snowmelt are known to buffer or decrease temperatures. Since snow/snowmelt processes don’t seem to be modeled, is this another source of uncertainty (e.g., unknown hydrologic changes)? I am especially thinking about the unregulated tributaries.
[7] I am interested in the differences in sensitivity (1.1 +/- 0.2) found in this study compared to previous studies. The authors suggest that this might be due to regulation, but I am interested in why the authors think this is the case. Could this sensitivity difference also be just due to the modeling or study assumptions?
Minor comments
[1] Is there any room for addition definitions in the abstract? For example, for those that do not work in regulated rivers, ‘thermopeaking’ is not a commonly used term.
[2] In the study site section, could the authors also present the average amount of snow this region receives every year?
[3] Is the use of the term ‘gallery’ as in ‘6 km long gallery’ common? I am not sure I have heard this usage before, but I am not deep in the reservoir community.
[4] The authors mention that the releases from the Rossens Dam are 2.5 cms and 3.5 cms depending on the season. This seems relatively simplistic. Are these values relatively stable from year-to-year no matter how wet or dry the system is?
[5] In section 2.4.1 it is not clear to me how you temporally downscaled the meteorological data to sub-daily. For example, Figure 2 doesn’t seem to be sub-daily, but the modeling needs sub-daily, right? Could you please add additional details on this?
[6] In section 2.5, why were the three reference years chosen? There were likely a lot of other years to choose from.
[7] In Table 1, are the model horizontal resolutions correct? 44 degrees is extremely large (1000s of km)!
[8] In section 3.1, are the authors presenting the average water temperature for the entire reach? Or is this one outlet? Not clear.
[9] In figure 10 for example, why do the temperatures at 0km differ? Is this just solely due to the lake water temperature differences with climate change?
[10] I am slightly confused by the thermopeaking results. Are the authors changing the thermopeaking characteristics, or are they held at their historical characteristics?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-599-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
96 | 29 | 3 | 128 | 2 | 4 |
- HTML: 96
- PDF: 29
- XML: 3
- Total: 128
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 21 | 18 |
China | 2 | 15 | 13 |
Switzerland | 3 | 13 | 11 |
Italy | 4 | 13 | 11 |
France | 5 | 7 | 6 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 21