the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Plant hydraulic traits regulating productivity and drought resistance in boreal crops
Abstract. Crop hydraulics play a critical role in coordinating crop photosynthesis and hydraulic safety when facing water scarcity. Boreal crop hydraulic traits and their relevance to productivity and drought resistance, however, remain poorly researched. In this study, we leveraged multi-year carbon and water flux measurements from a perennial forage grass and an annual cereal (oat) field in Finland using a novel process-based model with fully-coupled plant photosynthesis, hydraulics, and soil moisture to decipher the apparent hydraulic traits of the crops and their association with crop performances under varying drought conditions. It is found that both crops exhibited remarkably low hydraulic conductance, which plays a pivotal role in preventing soil water depletion and thereby ensures a high hydraulic safety margin and productivity under drought conditions. Both crops also showed higher susceptibility to atmospheric dryness than to soil drought, likely due to their anisohydric ("risky") stomatal behaviour. The remaining discrepancy between our model-inferred hydraulic traits and available empirical data for temperate crops highlights the need for more measurements of boreal crop hydraulic traits. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating crop hydraulic processes in process-based crop models to gain physiological insights for crop performance and to enhance their accuracy and predictive power in both current and future climates.
- Preprint
(5650 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3245 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5972', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 May 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5972/egusphere-2025-5972-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5972', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5972/egusphere-2025-5972-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5972/egusphere-2025-5972-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5972', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 May 2026
This is an interesting paper investigating boreal crop hydraulic traits and their relevance to productivity and drought resistance in Finland, focusing on both perennial forage grass and annual oat yield. The manuscript is well structured, fits within the scope of this journal, and presents the research in a logical and coherent manner with clear figures and sound data analysis. From my perspective, the paper is suitable for publication in BG. I do not have any major comments, but I would like to provide the following minor suggestions:
- This manuscript focuses on both soil drought and atmospheric drought. However, the term “meteorological drought” is also mentioned in a few places. From my perspective, this may be somewhat misleading and could make the terminology unnecessarily complicated. I suggest consistently using either “soil drought” or “atmospheric drought” throughout the manuscript.
- I suggest combining paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 into a single paragraph, since they all describe the efficiency hypothesis, safety hypothesis, and plasticity hypothesis. Similarly, paragraphs 6, 7, and 8 could also be merged into one paragraph, as they collectively describe the aims of the manuscript.
- Lines 50-51: please provide a few specific examples of crops showing phenotypic plasticity under different environmental conditions.
- As far as I understand, SPY-C is not a completely new model, but rather a coupled (integrated) modelling framework that combines several existing models into one system. Therefore, instead of stating “a newly developed SPY-C model,” I suggest using “a newly developed coupled modelling framework, SPY-C.”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5972-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5972/egusphere-2025-5972-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5972', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 May 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5972/egusphere-2025-5972-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5972/egusphere-2025-5972-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hui Tang, 01 Jul 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,543 | 691 | 243 | 2,477 | 418 | 211 | 231 |
- HTML: 1,543
- PDF: 691
- XML: 243
- Total: 2,477
- Supplement: 418
- BibTeX: 211
- EndNote: 231
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This is an interesting paper investigating boreal crop hydraulic traits and their relevance to productivity and drought resistance in Finland, focusing on both perennial forage grass and annual oat yield. The manuscript is well structured, fits within the scope of this journal, and presents the research in a logical and coherent manner with clear figures and sound data analysis. From my perspective, the paper is suitable for publication in BG. I do not have any major comments, but I would like to provide the following minor suggestions: